Hammertime wrote: ↑Sat Sep 05, 2020 3:29 am
Fuck me though, as much as we need a lb there is no signing that will make me happier than if we get Tarkowski. The bloke’s a brick wall with pace & positioning. Just one season of him playing behind Rice would be amazing & would probably drive Declan’s price up north of £70m.
Make you right, I suspect selling Diop will fund the fullback positions...
It’s not what you do it is the way that you do it.
Hammertime wrote: ↑Sat Sep 05, 2020 3:29 am
Fuck me though, as much as we need a lb there is no signing that will make me happier than if we get Tarkowski. The bloke’s a brick wall with pace & positioning. Just one season of him playing behind Rice would be amazing & would probably drive Declan’s price up north of £70m.
Make you right, I suspect selling Diop will fund the fullback positions...
Is Tarkowski an upgrade on Diop & Ogbonna ? Don't see it tbh. And he wouldn't be brought in as a back up. Illogical.
Why Is There Only One Monopolies Commission. Isn't That A Monopoly?
Make you right, I suspect selling Diop will fund the fullback positions...
Is Tarkowski an upgrade on Diop & Ogbonna ? Don't see it tbh. And he wouldn't be brought in as a back up. Illogical.
It’s a moot point anyway Whisk as Sullivan can’t afford Tarkowski at Burnley’s valuation anyway .
However the writing looks on the wall for Diop.
Tarkowski is much more the Messiah’s cup of tea , kick bollock bite & elbows.
Totally understandable considering his recent comments about needing more experienced Centre Backs .
Cresswell must be breathing one enormous sigh of relief.
Make you right, I suspect selling Diop will fund the fullback positions...
Is Tarkowski an upgrade on Diop & Ogbonna ? Don't see it tbh. And he wouldn't be brought in as a back up. Illogical.
I think if you watched our recent game against them, he was head and shoulders above Diop & Ogbonna. Proper nasty defender which tbh is probably what we need.
It’s not what you do it is the way that you do it.
The question isn't really is Tarkowski an upgrade on what we have? That's probably a yes.
The question is are we going to make an offer that's likely to be accepted?
I'm reading we've offered anywhere between £20m, no chance, and £27m, which still seems short. He's a key player for Burnley, still has 2 years on his contract, and at 27 should be in his prime.
Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society; all that it does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the labour of others by means of such appropriations.
Neville Bartos wrote: ↑Sat Sep 05, 2020 2:18 pm
The question isn't really is Tarkowski an upgrade on what we have? That's probably a yes.
The question is are we going to make an offer that's likely to be accepted?
I'm reading we've offered anywhere between £20m, no chance, and £27m, which still seems short. He's a key player for Burnley, still has 2 years on his contract, and at 27 should be in his prime.
