Why...

Chat about anything football related here!
User avatar
21212
Posts: 591
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2018 9:56 pm
x 1
x 29

Re: Why...

Post by 21212 » Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:48 am

h69 wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:42 am
21212 wrote:
Sat Aug 10, 2019 10:21 pm
is the modern fan so accepting of 5 -- 0 home defeats?
Dont care who it was against it was NEVER accepted until 10 years ago, let alone against a team in the same league.
City can't win CL.
City have not spent fortunes last 2 years.
Yet people accept a 5 - 0 defeat.

Why?
Acceptance is a free pass for our Manager to coach horrendously poorly akin to a Sunday league manager.
City have not spent fortunes last 2 years :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Man City net spend last 2 years £124 million.
West Ham net spend last 2 years £120 million.
Brighton net spend last 2 years £141 million. I guess we should be happy with a 6 - 0 defeat at home to Brighton.

There you go muppet.
Be factually correct or I won't bother with you.
0 x

User avatar
Towie
Posts: 1684
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 8:06 pm
x 148
x 98

Re: Why...

Post by Towie » Tue Aug 13, 2019 12:03 pm

21212 wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:48 am
h69 wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:42 am


City have not spent fortunes last 2 years :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Man City net spend last 2 years £124 million.
West Ham net spend last 2 years £120 million.
Brighton net spend last 2 years £141 million. I guess we should be happy with a 6 - 0 defeat at home to Brighton.

There you go muppet.
Be factually correct or I won't bother with you.
What does the Citeh team cost in comparison to ours?
Forget the two years what was the value of their team on Saturday. The likes of Citeh, Liverpool and spuds have spent fortunes over the last 10 years to get to this point. We have only spent big on one window!

Stupid to compare based on last two seasons.
1 x
It’s not what you do it is the way that you do it.

User avatar
andyginbrasil
Posts: 3315
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2017 4:05 am
Location: Brasil
x 591
x 446

Re: Why...

Post by andyginbrasil » Tue Aug 13, 2019 12:07 pm

h69 wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:42 am


City have not spent fortunes last 2 years :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
I take that you mean the LAST two years doesn't mean this year H.........now lets see the the factually correct figures.
( You would have to factor in the value of the players they sold bought by the big bucks in earlier years.)

I will help.......Gross Spend
Man City Two years ago gross spend....285 million......Net spend........203 million
West Ham...................................51 million.......Net Spend........+11 million

I will let you do the rest... ;) ....
Take him down
0 x

User avatar
21212
Posts: 591
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2018 9:56 pm
x 1
x 29

Re: Why...

Post by 21212 » Tue Aug 13, 2019 12:14 pm

Towie wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 12:03 pm
21212 wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:48 am



Man City net spend last 2 years £124 million.
West Ham net spend last 2 years £120 million.
Brighton net spend last 2 years £141 million. I guess we should be happy with a 6 - 0 defeat at home to Brighton.

There you go muppet.
Be factually correct or I won't bother with you.
What does the Citeh team cost in comparison to ours?
Forget the two years what was the value of their team on Saturday. The likes of Citeh, Liverpool and spuds have spent fortunes over the last 10 years to get to this point. We have only spent big on one window!

Stupid to compare based on last two seasons.
Sterling £49 million Anderson £42 million.

Aguero £23 million. Jesus £27 million. Haller £45 million.

David Silva £26 million. Yarmalenko £20 million.
0 x

User avatar
21212
Posts: 591
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2018 9:56 pm
x 1
x 29

Re: Why...

Post by 21212 » Tue Aug 13, 2019 12:15 pm

andyginbrasil wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 12:07 pm
h69 wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:42 am


City have not spent fortunes last 2 years :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
I take that you mean the LAST two years doesn't mean this year H.........now lets see the the factually correct figures.
( You would have to factor in the value of the players they sold bought by the big bucks in earlier years.)

I will help.......Gross Spend
Man City Two years ago gross spend....285 million......Net spend........203 million
West Ham...................................51 million.......Net Spend........+11 million

I will let you do the rest... ;) ....
Take him down
What the fuck you talking about? Get one of your girls to research that? :lol: :lol:
0 x

User avatar
Castiron
Posts: 2681
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 6:22 pm
x 51
x 115

Re: Why...

Post by Castiron » Tue Aug 13, 2019 12:46 pm

21212 wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 12:14 pm
Towie wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 12:03 pm


What does the Citeh team cost in comparison to ours?
Forget the two years what was the value of their team on Saturday. The likes of Citeh, Liverpool and spuds have spent fortunes over the last 10 years to get to this point. We have only spent big on one window!

Stupid to compare based on last two seasons.
Sterling £49 million Anderson £42 million.

Aguero £23 million. Jesus £27 million. Haller £45 million.

David Silva £26 million. Yarmalenko £20 million.
Those players that you mention for City would be double that now if they were trying to buy them today, if age was on their side. We are paying over the odds, but it's the market.
Harry McGuire £85m
0 x

User avatar
21212
Posts: 591
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2018 9:56 pm
x 1
x 29

Re: Why...

Post by 21212 » Tue Aug 13, 2019 12:58 pm

Castiron wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 12:46 pm
21212 wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 12:14 pm


Sterling £49 million Anderson £42 million.

Aguero £23 million. Jesus £27 million. Haller £45 million.

David Silva £26 million. Yarmalenko £20 million.
Those players that you mention for City would be double that now if they were trying to buy them today, if age was on their side. We are paying over the odds, but it's the market.
Harry McGuire £85m
So, what you're saying is City showed good, prudent financial management by beating the upturn and have now eased up spending since market went mad.

Mire reason we shouldn't be getting fived against them.
0 x

User avatar
Castiron
Posts: 2681
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 6:22 pm
x 51
x 115

Re: Why...

Post by Castiron » Tue Aug 13, 2019 1:04 pm

21212 wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 12:58 pm
Castiron wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 12:46 pm

Those players that you mention for City would be double that now if they were trying to buy them today, if age was on their side. We are paying over the odds, but it's the market.
Harry McGuire £85m
So, what you're saying is City showed good, prudent financial management by beating the upturn and have now eased up spending since market went mad.

Mire reason we shouldn't be getting fived against them.
No, I am saying that they have considerably better players than us, who in today's market would be double the money that City paid for them when they did. Hope that helps.
0 x

User avatar
h69
Posts: 3447
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2017 6:51 pm
Location: Enfield, Middlesex
x 235
x 167

Re: Why...

Post by h69 » Tue Aug 13, 2019 2:10 pm

21212 wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:48 am
h69 wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:42 am


City have not spent fortunes last 2 years :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Man City net spend last 2 years £124 million.
West Ham net spend last 2 years £120 million.
Brighton net spend last 2 years £141 million. I guess we should be happy with a 6 - 0 defeat at home to Brighton.

There you go muppet.
Be factually correct or I won't bother with you.
muppet :lol:

Have you forgotten the team that is already there prior to the net spend in the last two years ? probably the best team ever seen in the PL...that is what I was laughing about. Their net spend this season alone is 89M and that is with the greatest team ever assembled in the PL plus de Bruyne fit again. :lol:

Its like saying Liverpool have no players because all they have signed is a junior and a couple of sub goalkeepers :lol:
Attachments
Screen Shot 2019-08-13 at 14.31.31.png
Screen Shot 2019-08-13 at 14.31.31.png (396.51 KiB) Viewed 138 times
1 x
Watchout for Spongebob

User avatar
Towie
Posts: 1684
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 8:06 pm
x 148
x 98

Re: Why...

Post by Towie » Tue Aug 13, 2019 6:07 pm

21212 wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 12:14 pm
Towie wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 12:03 pm


What does the Citeh team cost in comparison to ours?
Forget the two years what was the value of their team on Saturday. The likes of Citeh, Liverpool and spuds have spent fortunes over the last 10 years to get to this point. We have only spent big on one window!

Stupid to compare based on last two seasons.
Sterling £49 million Anderson £42 million.

Aguero £23 million. Jesus £27 million. Haller £45 million.

David Silva £26 million. Yarmalenko £20 million.

As I said stupid to compare last 2 years, Yarmolenko didn’t even play and you seem to have inflated his transfer price by 3mil!
Anderson inflated price by 7m!

Now tot up their defence compared to ours, midfield also. Then come back instead of picking players to suit your argument.
Then look at last 10 years spend compared to ours arsewipe.
0 x
It’s not what you do it is the way that you do it.

Post Reply

Social Media