So I was correct again

Chat about anything football related here!
User avatar
wokinghama
Posts: 702
Joined: Sun May 29, 2016 2:38 pm
x 185
x 74

Re: So I was correct again

Post by wokinghama » Sun May 10, 2020 5:55 pm

9898 wrote:
Sun May 10, 2020 1:53 pm
terrya1965 wrote:
Sat May 09, 2020 8:15 pm


Has I and Whiskyman have said,these people will NEVER be skint.That is a very important part of them affording to buy Newcastle or whoever it is they decide to invest in?.Money isn`t an issue to them.It will NEVER be a problem.They could could probably buy every PL club if they wanted to.

End of argument.
Terry, I'm getting a little bit annoyed with you. I think you're purposely not thinking about the subject.
If you have ever dealt with mega rich people, you will know that their value of the pound is far greater than the bloke living on a council estate (oziron).
They would not purchase Newcastle if they thought it was a depreciating asset.
End of thread, and your respectability if you persist in disagreeing with plain, simple facts.
Just asking, why would you ridicule people leaving in council houses?
0 x
Chim Chimeney

User avatar
9898
Posts: 359
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 7:42 am
x 35

Re: So I was correct again

Post by 9898 » Sun May 10, 2020 6:13 pm

wokinghama wrote:
Sun May 10, 2020 5:55 pm
9898 wrote:
Sun May 10, 2020 1:53 pm


Terry, I'm getting a little bit annoyed with you. I think you're purposely not thinking about the subject.
If you have ever dealt with mega rich people, you will know that their value of the pound is far greater than the bloke living on a council estate (oziron).
They would not purchase Newcastle if they thought it was a depreciating asset.
End of thread, and your respectability if you persist in disagreeing with plain, simple facts.
Just asking, why would you ridicule people leaving in council houses?
How is that ridiculing? Exact opposite.
It is obvious that people living in council houses do not have the same funds as the mega rich. I am saying they are not as consumed with money as the mega rich. Surely everyone sees that as a compliment to council tenants.
I know what group of people I would prefer to socialise with, and they don't drive Bentleys.

p.s My Mum was born Roman Road and my Dad was born Forest Gate. Cant be much more working class than that.
0 x
Heard about the wife in Australia who slept with less that 40 blokes? No one has, they are still searching for her.

User avatar
wokinghama
Posts: 702
Joined: Sun May 29, 2016 2:38 pm
x 185
x 74

Re: So I was correct again

Post by wokinghama » Sun May 10, 2020 6:38 pm

9898 wrote:
Sun May 10, 2020 6:13 pm
wokinghama wrote:
Sun May 10, 2020 5:55 pm


Just asking, why would you ridicule people leaving in council houses?
How is that ridiculing? Exact opposite.
It is obvious that people living in council houses do not have the same funds as the mega rich. I am saying they are not as consumed with money as the mega rich. Surely everyone sees that as a compliment to council tenants.
I know what group of people I would prefer to socialise with, and they don't drive Bentleys.

p.s My Mum was born Roman Road and my Dad was born Forest Gate. Cant be much more working class than that.
Purely on the basis in which you said it - with your obvious spat with oz. Therefore using it in a condescending context which null and voids the rest of your post.

I believe you about your roots etc. and I actually think I know what you’re alluding to, but imo you could have used a different way of putting it, or ignored the oz thing.

Just my opinion tho
0 x
Chim Chimeney

User avatar
9898
Posts: 359
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 7:42 am
x 35

Re: So I was correct again

Post by 9898 » Sun May 10, 2020 7:14 pm

wokinghama wrote:
Sun May 10, 2020 6:38 pm
9898 wrote:
Sun May 10, 2020 6:13 pm


How is that ridiculing? Exact opposite.
It is obvious that people living in council houses do not have the same funds as the mega rich. I am saying they are not as consumed with money as the mega rich. Surely everyone sees that as a compliment to council tenants.
I know what group of people I would prefer to socialise with, and they don't drive Bentleys.

p.s My Mum was born Roman Road and my Dad was born Forest Gate. Cant be much more working class than that.
Purely on the basis in which you said it - with your obvious spat with oz. Therefore using it in a condescending context which null and voids the rest of your post.

I believe you about your roots etc. and I actually think I know what you’re alluding to, but imo you could have used a different way of putting it, or ignored the oz thing.

Just my opinion tho
Fair point.
The uz comment was just a bit of fun. Let's not micro analyse every comment on here as 90% of the posts will prove what a bunch of c###s the posters are ;)
0 x
Heard about the wife in Australia who slept with less that 40 blokes? No one has, they are still searching for her.

User avatar
terrya1965
Posts: 5097
Joined: Sun May 29, 2016 8:48 pm
x 823
x 668

Re: So I was correct again

Post by terrya1965 » Sun May 10, 2020 8:32 pm

9898 wrote:
Sun May 10, 2020 1:53 pm
terrya1965 wrote:
Sat May 09, 2020 8:15 pm


Has I and Whiskyman have said,these people will NEVER be skint.That is a very important part of them affording to buy Newcastle or whoever it is they decide to invest in?.Money isn`t an issue to them.It will NEVER be a problem.They could could probably buy every PL club if they wanted to.

End of argument.
Terry, I'm getting a little bit annoyed with you. I think you're purposely not thinking about the subject.
If you have ever dealt with mega rich people, you will know that their value of the pound is far greater than the bloke living on a council estate (oziron).
They would not purchase Newcastle if they thought it was a depreciating asset.
End of thread, and your respectability if you persist in disagreeing with plain, simple facts.
I think you are talking crap on this subject,so are questioning why?

You,has well has me,know Newcastle with their fan base will be an asset.If they got successful,they could easy get 80,000 at Home games,They are an asset,but I don`t think the Arabs are looking on how much money they are going to make.
It`s very similar situation at City.They are in it to put Newcastle on the map of the World,by winning trophies.That`s why they are buying Newcastle,not to make money..Finances isn't a worry to them.You seem to think it is?
In comparison let`s look how the Yanks work in the PL.The Glaziers mortgaged Man Utd to buy them and Kroenke brought Arsenal to fund his other business's.They use their football clubs to make money for themselves,where the Arabs don't.

Back to the original subject..Do you think Football Clubs are going to be worth more..About the same..Or less than before the pandemic?
All the Financial Experts are saying a lot less

The way your mind works,I reckon,you are going to say more. :lol:
0 x

User avatar
Haribo
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2018 8:34 am
x 2
x 26

Re: So I was correct again

Post by Haribo » Mon May 11, 2020 8:52 am

9898 wrote:
Sun May 10, 2020 6:13 pm
wokinghama wrote:
Sun May 10, 2020 5:55 pm


Just asking, why would you ridicule people leaving in council houses?
How is that ridiculing? Exact op inposite.
It is obvious that people living in council houses do not have the same funds as the mega rich. I am saying they are not as consumed with money as the mega rich. Surely everyone sees that as a compliment to council tenants.
I know what group of people I would prefer to socialise with, and they don't drive Bentleys.

p.s My Mum was born Roman Road and my Dad was born Forest Gate. Cant be much more working class than that.
We all must have a good idea where they moved to when they had you, it was clearly not anywhere near Barking Road, you're no fan of WH
0 x

User avatar
9898
Posts: 359
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 7:42 am
x 35

Re: So I was correct again

Post by 9898 » Mon May 11, 2020 9:42 am

Haribo wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 8:52 am
9898 wrote:
Sun May 10, 2020 6:13 pm


How is that ridiculing? Exact op inposite.
It is obvious that people living in council houses do not have the same funds as the mega rich. I am saying they are not as consumed with money as the mega rich. Surely everyone sees that as a compliment to council tenants.
I know what group of people I would prefer to socialise with, and they don't drive Bentleys.

p.s My Mum was born Roman Road and my Dad was born Forest Gate. Cant be much more working class than that.
We all must have a good idea where they moved to when they had you, it was clearly not anywhere near Barking Road, you're no fan of WH
OOh, the club sops come out of hiding.

Come on then big boy, lets have a little quiz to see how 'West Ham :lol: ' you are.
0 x
Heard about the wife in Australia who slept with less that 40 blokes? No one has, they are still searching for her.

User avatar
Whiskyman
Posts: 9989
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:05 pm
x 267
x 1343

Re: So I was correct again

Post by Whiskyman » Mon May 11, 2020 10:55 am

ToneLoc wrote:
Sun May 10, 2020 2:37 pm
terrya1965 wrote:
Sun May 10, 2020 12:11 pm


Lets be honest,the players and coaches are being forced into a situation they don't want to be in.I wouldn`t be surprised if over half don't participate.
It`s all to do with Broadcasters and Chairmen/Directors wanting their money,which I can understand.We are just in a climate,where it`s just very difficult to do.
I just wonder how “eager” the players would be to get back playing if they had been furloughed without pay like some other top sports clubs?
I was chatting to a mate in the U.S yesterday and he said the MLB clubs aren’t paying many of their players and they are all chomping at the bit to get back.

It’s funny how $$$$ does wonders for a person’s sense of “duty” 😉
Tone, hasn't it occurred to you they might be concerned about their integrity ? ;)
0 x
TRADITION--Just because we've always done it like this doesn't mean it's not incredibly SILLY

User avatar
ToneLoc
Posts: 8866
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2016 2:21 pm
x 334
x 902

Re: So I was correct again

Post by ToneLoc » Mon May 11, 2020 11:12 am

Whiskyman wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 10:55 am
ToneLoc wrote:
Sun May 10, 2020 2:37 pm

I just wonder how “eager” the players would be to get back playing if they had been furloughed without pay like some other top sports clubs?
I was chatting to a mate in the U.S yesterday and he said the MLB clubs aren’t paying many of their players and they are all chomping at the bit to get back.

It’s funny how $$$$ does wonders for a person’s sense of “duty” 😉
Tone, hasn't it occurred to you they might be concerned about their integrity ? ;)
I’m picturing a famous Basil Fawlty scene....... “vvvoooomm..... what was that?. That was your integrity mate. Oh, do I get another one? Sorry mate that’s your lot”
0 x
Jurgen Klopp’s teeth are giving me a migraine

User avatar
terrya1965
Posts: 5097
Joined: Sun May 29, 2016 8:48 pm
x 823
x 668

Re: So I was correct again

Post by terrya1965 » Mon May 11, 2020 11:16 am

Whiskyman wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 10:55 am
ToneLoc wrote:
Sun May 10, 2020 2:37 pm

I just wonder how “eager” the players would be to get back playing if they had been furloughed without pay like some other top sports clubs?
I was chatting to a mate in the U.S yesterday and he said the MLB clubs aren’t paying many of their players and they are all chomping at the bit to get back.

It’s funny how $$$$ does wonders for a person’s sense of “duty” 😉
Tone, hasn't it occurred to you they might be concerned about their integrity ? ;)
I do wonder how the players would react if they said the Clubs will not pay them till they come back?
0 x

Post Reply

Social Media