Page 1 of 3

transfer money

Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2016 8:01 pm
by boba
According to the paper today West Ham have spent 117M this window, I can only get to approx. 45M can anybody give me the full spend?

Re: transfer money

Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2016 8:12 pm
by Gonzo
What paper is that mate? It's nowhere near accurate.

There is some debate over whether Lanzini is this or last seasons signing but it was only a £9m transfer so does not alter the figure that much.

Re: transfer money

Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2016 8:14 pm
by 1234
boba wrote:According to the paper today West Ham have spent 117M this window, I can only get to approx. 45M can anybody give me the full spend?
We haven't spent £20 million!!!

Re: transfer money

Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2016 8:25 pm
by eskimo joe
1234 wrote:
boba wrote:According to the paper today West Ham have spent 117M this window, I can only get to approx. 45M can anybody give me the full spend?
We haven't spent £20 million!!!
Cause we have, and we got a fair bit in.. And does one really need to be out of pocket for a transfer window to be deemed good?

Re: transfer money

Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2016 9:46 pm
by Towie
1234 wrote:
boba wrote:According to the paper today West Ham have spent 117M this window, I can only get to approx. 45M can anybody give me the full spend?
We haven't spent £20 million!!!

I see the village idiot has got it wrong again.

Re: transfer money

Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2016 10:20 pm
by 1234
Towie wrote:
1234 wrote:
We haven't spent £20 million!!!

I see the village idiot has got it wrong again.
Harsh on Bobsy.

Tomkins £12 million.

£20 Ayew.
The new left back £6 million
Tore loan£2.5 million.
Calleri lian £2 million tops.
Lanzini was last seasons signing.

Do not let the club bull sh#t you they have spent more.

Re: transfer money

Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2016 10:35 pm
by eskimo joe
1234 wrote:
Towie wrote:

I see the village idiot has got it wrong again.
Harsh on Bobsy.

Tomkins £12 million.

£20 Ayew.
The new left back £6 million
Tore loan£2.5 million.
Calleri lian £2 million tops.
Lanzini was last seasons signing.

Do not let the club bull sh#t you they have spent more.
Der. You get £20 wages buy £20 of groceries. So you spent nothing.

Re: transfer money

Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2016 11:32 pm
by Brookbonds73
So what was the 2.4 mil for Martinez, lira? :lol:

Re: transfer money

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2016 12:15 am
by Neville Bartos
1234 wrote:
Harsh on Bobsy.

Tomkins £12 million.

£20 Ayew.
The new left back £6 million
Tore loan£2.5 million.
Calleri lian £2 million tops.
Lanzini was last seasons signing.

Do not let the club bull sh#t you they have spent more.
Add a few million to the outs, take a couple of million off the ins, eh? You're the last person to wank on about bullshit.
And of course Lanzini was this seasons signing. He was on loan, we exercised an option to sign him permanently in April, and the transfer was completed when the current transfer window opened.

Re: transfer money

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2016 12:31 am
by Newmarket
Brookbonds73 wrote:So what was the 2.4 mil for Martinez, lira? :lol:
Did he not come sometime last season ?

Number's numbers may be a tad off as it depends on whose figures you read or believe but he does have a point to a degree .

I had Tomkins out £10m

Ins ?

Ayew £20m
New LB £4m
Tore loan £5m
Calleri loan £400k

The Club propaganda machine would have you believe , rightly or wrongly , that enormous signing on fees paid to the Bosman signings plus fees paid for Lanzini , possibly Martinez which to my mind were finalised prior to this transfer window , all contribute to their gross spend this summer thus bumping up their figures .

Now I'm not saying that good business can't be done on the cheap . It can . But nobody knows if it's good business yet do they ?

And if the club's figures (whatever they are) are to believed then that brings into the question of whether they ever really intended to bring in a top striker at all doesn't it ?