Pure Greed

Chat about anything football related here!
User avatar
Gonzo
Posts: 5977
Joined: Sat May 28, 2016 8:13 pm

Re: Pure Greed

Postby Gonzo » Wed Jun 13, 2018 9:03 am

Ron Manager wrote:
Dicksies Diner wrote:Fair play to him if he can get it.

Absolutely.

Tattoos don't pay for themselves.


:lol:
0 x

User avatar
h69
Posts: 2677
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2017 6:51 pm
Location: Ruislip, Middlesex

Re: Pure Greed

Postby h69 » Wed Jun 13, 2018 3:56 pm

Neville Bartos wrote:
Baddowhammer wrote:A good example of why we shouldn't pay anyone £190k a week as was wanted by Pastore,he's good but not De Bruyne,Aguero,Silva class he's an ungrateful young shit that needs bringing back down to earth.COYI


You don't believe that propaganda, do you? As the days went by Pastore's 'demands' went from £175k to £180k and finished up at a £190k.
Since PSG at no point accepted any offer we might have considered making, how would we have negotiated any kind of wage with the player?
And since our club is happy to offer half a player's transfer value, wouldn't it be safe to assume any initial wage demands would be well above what might be deemed acceptable?

Pastore = spin. No actual interest. Estimated wage demands cited as the reason for not continuing. Classic Sullivan.


To be fair to Baddow, the reason PSG want rid of Pastore is his enormous wages because of FFP so they have said so it does lend a bit of credence to that story.
0 x

User avatar
Ibbyham
Posts: 1214
Joined: Mon May 30, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Pure Greed

Postby Ibbyham » Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:53 pm

BillyDWhizz wrote:£175k a week. That's what Raheem Stirling earns at City. Now he wants more - he wants to be one of City's top earners, which would put him in the £250-280k a week bracket. Now, he's a decent enough footballer but if he thinks for a second he's worth that kind of money, then he needs his fucking head read. Greedy little fuck. City could easily fuck him off and replace him with someone equally as talented for a lot, lot less but they won't, they will buckle and pay the greedy little shit. Shows exactly whats wrong with the game when good footballers can force clubs to pay them world class footballer wages.

Greedy player and hope Man City will kick him out to Real Madrid if he want a big dosh....He is only thinking of himself, very poor respectful person.
0 x

User avatar
Neville Bartos
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 2:29 am
Location: Flyyyyyyyyyin'

Re: Pure Greed

Postby Neville Bartos » Thu Jun 14, 2018 12:18 am

h69 wrote:
Neville Bartos wrote:
You don't believe that propaganda, do you? As the days went by Pastore's 'demands' went from £175k to £180k and finished up at a £190k.
Since PSG at no point accepted any offer we might have considered making, how would we have negotiated any kind of wage with the player?
And since our club is happy to offer half a player's transfer value, wouldn't it be safe to assume any initial wage demands would be well above what might be deemed acceptable?

Pastore = spin. No actual interest. Estimated wage demands cited as the reason for not continuing. Classic Sullivan.


To be fair to Baddow, the reason PSG want rid of Pastore is his enormous wages because of FFP so they have said so it does lend a bit of credence to that story.


I wasn't having a go at our boy Baddow. But that transfer was never, ever happening. And to knock it on the head based on guestimates of what Pastore might be on at PSG, and might demand at West Ham, is clearly a load of old cobblers.
Sullivan has form in this area.
0 x
Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society; all that it does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the labour of others by means of such appropriations.

User avatar
FlatCapDave
Posts: 183
Joined: Tue May 15, 2018 9:36 am

Re: Pure Greed

Postby FlatCapDave » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:34 am

BillyDWhizz wrote:£175k a week. That's what Raheem Stirling earns at City. Now he wants more - he wants to be one of City's top earners, which would put him in the £250-280k a week bracket. Now, he's a decent enough footballer but if he thinks for a second he's worth that kind of money, then he needs his fucking head read.


Let's face it, none of them are worth that kind of fucking money. Not one of them. They're kicking a ball around a grass field, not curing cancer.

Personally, I've long since stopped caring what footballers earn, and what clubs pay for them. None of the money being chucked about makes any sense in the real world, so I just look at it on the basis of who's going where. That's all that interests me really. If we sign so and so, I can watch them playing.

How much some wealthy cunts pay for his services, and how many fucking cars the player has means not a jot to me.
1 x

User avatar
Baddowhammer
Posts: 1206
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 12:00 pm

Re: Pure Greed

Postby Baddowhammer » Thu Jun 14, 2018 12:34 pm

Neville Bartos wrote:
Baddowhammer wrote:A good example of why we shouldn't pay anyone £190k a week as was wanted by Pastore,he's good but not De Bruyne,Aguero,Silva class he's an ungrateful young shit that needs bringing back down to earth.COYI


You don't believe that propaganda, do you? As the days went by Pastore's 'demands' went from £175k to £180k and finished up at a £190k.
Since PSG at no point accepted any offer we might have considered making, how would we have negotiated any kind of wage with the player?
And since our club is happy to offer half a player's transfer value, wouldn't it be safe to assume any initial wage demands would be well above what might be deemed acceptable?

Pastore = spin. No actual interest. Estimated wage demands cited as the reason for not continuing. Classic Sullivan.

No I didn't for one minute think this one was a goer,but was using it as an example really as to why we can't entertain anyone who is after that colossal wage.COYI
0 x


Return to “Football Talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DanishHammer, Taansend, Towie and 23 guests