Pure Greed

Chat about anything football related here!
User avatar
BlackDiamond
Posts: 3277
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2016 7:46 pm
x 134
x 66

Re: Pure Greed

Post by BlackDiamond » Tue Jun 12, 2018 5:13 pm

dorsetdano wrote:I thought this thread was going to be about the Dudley Dinosaur! :i am genuinely amused: :i am genuinely amused:
He is interviewed on BBC thursday in a hastily appropriate documentary about lives of great England managers...god help us
0 x

User avatar
h69
Posts: 3069
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2017 6:51 pm
Location: Enfield, Middlesex
x 93
x 67

Re: Pure Greed

Post by h69 » Tue Jun 12, 2018 6:41 pm

BillyDWhizz wrote:£175k a week. That's what Raheem Stirling earns at City. Now he wants more - he wants to be one of City's top earners, which would put him in the £250-280k a week bracket. Now, he's a decent enough footballer but if he thinks for a second he's worth that kind of money, then he needs his fucking head read. Greedy little fuck. City could easily fuck him off and replace him with someone equally as talented for a lot, lot less but they won't, they will buckle and pay the greedy little shit. Shows exactly whats wrong with the game when good footballers can force clubs to pay them world class footballer wages.
He hasnt forced them yet and he wants to be careful or they will do to him what they did to Yaya and just leave him to rot in the reserves,.
0 x
Watchout for Spongebob

User avatar
ToneLoc
Posts: 7015
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2016 2:21 pm
x 64
x 141

Re: Pure Greed

Post by ToneLoc » Tue Jun 12, 2018 6:43 pm

The fat Jurassic prick's England starting lineup.
Thank fuck he got the bullet.
https://talksport.com/football/381875/s ... -cup-team/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
0 x
"Gentlemen you can't fight in here this is the war room"

User avatar
Whiskyman
Posts: 6363
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:05 pm
x 39
x 172

Re: Pure Greed

Post by Whiskyman » Tue Jun 12, 2018 8:21 pm

BillyDWhizz wrote:£175k a week. That's what Raheem Stirling earns at City. Now he wants more - he wants to be one of City's top earners, which would put him in the £250-280k a week bracket. Now, he's a decent enough footballer but if he thinks for a second he's worth that kind of money, then he needs his fucking head read. Greedy little fuck. City could easily fuck him off and replace him with someone equally as talented for a lot, lot less but they won't, they will buckle and pay the greedy little shit. Shows exactly whats wrong with the game when good footballers can force clubs to pay them world class footballer wages.
Don't agree. He's not forcing City to pay anything they don't want to. As you said yourself City could easily fuck him off and replace him with someone better. Which they may well decide to do. They aren't short of a few bon after all. ;)
0 x
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.

User avatar
Neville Bartos
Posts: 3048
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 2:29 am
Location: Flyyyyyyyyyin'
x 138
x 167

Re: Pure Greed

Post by Neville Bartos » Tue Jun 12, 2018 8:43 pm

Baddowhammer wrote:A good example of why we shouldn't pay anyone £190k a week as was wanted by Pastore,he's good but not De Bruyne,Aguero,Silva class he's an ungrateful young shit that needs bringing back down to earth.COYI
You don't believe that propaganda, do you? As the days went by Pastore's 'demands' went from £175k to £180k and finished up at a £190k.
Since PSG at no point accepted any offer we might have considered making, how would we have negotiated any kind of wage with the player?
And since our club is happy to offer half a player's transfer value, wouldn't it be safe to assume any initial wage demands would be well above what might be deemed acceptable?

Pastore = spin. No actual interest. Estimated wage demands cited as the reason for not continuing. Classic Sullivan.
0 x
Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society; all that it does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the labour of others by means of such appropriations.

User avatar
BillyDWhizz
Posts: 2562
Joined: Sat May 28, 2016 7:34 pm
x 28
x 70

Re: Pure Greed

Post by BillyDWhizz » Tue Jun 12, 2018 9:53 pm

Whiskyman wrote:
BillyDWhizz wrote:£175k a week. That's what Raheem Stirling earns at City. Now he wants more - he wants to be one of City's top earners, which would put him in the £250-280k a week bracket. Now, he's a decent enough footballer but if he thinks for a second he's worth that kind of money, then he needs his fucking head read. Greedy little fuck. City could easily fuck him off and replace him with someone equally as talented for a lot, lot less but they won't, they will buckle and pay the greedy little shit. Shows exactly whats wrong with the game when good footballers can force clubs to pay them world class footballer wages.
Don't agree. He's not forcing City to pay anything they don't want to. As you said yourself City could easily fuck him off and replace him with someone better. Which they may well decide to do. They aren't short of a few bon after all. ;)
But my point about greed stands no?
0 x
I hate it when people don't know the difference between "your" and "you're". There so stupid.

User avatar
terrya1965
Posts: 3357
Joined: Sun May 29, 2016 8:48 pm
x 179
x 113

Re: Pure Greed

Post by terrya1965 » Tue Jun 12, 2018 10:20 pm

ToneLoc wrote:The fat Jurassic prick's England starting lineup.
Thank fuck he got the bullet.
https://talksport.com/football/381875/s ... -cup-team/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
He wouldn`t have played a back 3..That was Southgate`s idea to do that,not his.

Has I said in another thread,he said he`d settle for a draw in the our first game if he was in charge.Thank f*ck his not in charge then.
0 x

User avatar
Whiskyman
Posts: 6363
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:05 pm
x 39
x 172

Re: Pure Greed

Post by Whiskyman » Wed Jun 13, 2018 12:21 am

BillyDWhizz wrote:
Whiskyman wrote:
Don't agree. He's not forcing City to pay anything they don't want to. As you said yourself City could easily fuck him off and replace him with someone better. Which they may well decide to do. They aren't short of a few bon after all. ;)
But my point about greed stands no?
Yes. But aren't we all basically greedy? If you thought you could persuade your rmployer to double your salary because he feared you would go and work for someone else wouldn't you do it ?
0 x
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.

User avatar
Taansend
Posts: 7124
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2016 9:40 pm
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Contact:

Re: Pure Greed

Post by Taansend » Wed Jun 13, 2018 4:52 am

It's the daily Sterling Whinge thread :lol:
0 x

User avatar
Jacko1966
Posts: 468
Joined: Sun May 29, 2016 4:24 pm
x 11
x 10

Re: Pure Greed

Post by Jacko1966 » Wed Jun 13, 2018 8:19 am

Hammershark wrote:It’s easy from our world to get annoyed with greedy players... and they are fuckin greedy basturds .... but if you or me had an agent and he said he could get double your current wages from you current employer for doing the same job...... well I know what I would say...go get it son !
True enough. I'm a big-headed cunt who happens to believe he's better than any of his 16 colleagues at doing the job we do. I reckon I should be paid more than them but we all get the same and if someone said to me that they could get me more I'd bite their hand off. £200k a week would do.
0 x

Post Reply

Social Media