4-3-3 formation

Chat about anything football related here!
User avatar
BlackDiamond
Posts: 4034
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2016 7:46 pm
x 457
x 295

Re: 4-4-3 formation

Post by BlackDiamond » Mon Aug 22, 2016 9:40 pm

MitchFY66 wrote:Only just realised that I made a series of typos here :shock: Of course I mean. 433 not 443 ahhahahah :lol: glad you lot haven't ripped me over it
You guys...why don't you just edit it ? Your the author so no foul. In fact,I would alter it to 4-4-4 just for sheer bloody mindedness shakeass
0 x

User avatar
JayK
Posts: 6149
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 11:12 am
Location: Essex
x 94
x 14

Re: 4-4-3 formation

Post by JayK » Mon Aug 22, 2016 10:12 pm

1234 wrote:Our problem is not formation it is pace.
We need to move the ball a lot, lot quicker and require some pace up front.
And positioning and movement. I saw a big hole right in the middle of the park, Sunday and Noble had nobody to pass to.
0 x
COYI!!!

User avatar
JayK
Posts: 6149
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 11:12 am
Location: Essex
x 94
x 14

Re: 4-3-3 formation

Post by JayK » Mon Aug 22, 2016 10:13 pm

I do prefer 443 and 444 over 433 though. Just hope the refs don't notice
0 x
COYI!!!

User avatar
bigfacemike
Posts: 697
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:08 am
Location: Berkhamsted
x 1
Contact:

Re: 4-3-3 formation

Post by bigfacemike » Mon Aug 22, 2016 10:25 pm

How about 4141. At least it adds up! We don't get outnumbered in midfield (my main issue with 442) and it pushes Payet, Antonio et el further up the pitch.
Or how about 4231 with Feguli at 10? Or any combination with some fit players???
0 x

hammerman69
Posts: 470
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 10:18 am

Re: Re : 4-4-3 formation

Post by hammerman69 » Mon Aug 22, 2016 11:32 pm

blackcountryhammer wrote:4 4 3 would mean a extra man for us so I'm for it, not sure about the premier league though, might wanna check ya formation numbers lol
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
0 x

Post Reply

Social Media