West Ham v Manchester Utd - Official Match Thread

Old Match Day Threads, Current one is under 'Football talk'
User avatar
H4L
Posts: 288
Joined: Sun May 29, 2016 9:31 am
Contact:

Re: West Ham v Manchester Utd - Official Match Thread

Postby H4L » Mon Jan 02, 2017 7:28 pm

Can't fault the effort today. All plans go straight out of the window. Ref and linesman have been a total disgrace. If Antonio take his chance at 0-0 who knows?
0 x

User avatar
Porterman
Posts: 1683
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2016 8:49 am

Re: West Ham v Manchester Utd - Official Match Thread

Postby Porterman » Mon Jan 02, 2017 7:32 pm

H4L wrote:Can't fault the effort today. All plans go straight out of the window. Ref and linesman have been a total disgrace. If Antonio take his chance at 0-0 who knows?


Doubtful if we would have got 2 better chances even with 11 men .

You have to take these chances whether it's 11 V 11 or anything else.

It's what the outcomes are decided by.
0 x

User avatar
IRON-MAN ⚒
Posts: 473
Joined: Sun May 29, 2016 8:09 am
Location: TROWBRIDGE WILTSHIRE

Re: West Ham v Manchester Utd - Official Match Thread

Postby IRON-MAN ⚒ » Mon Jan 02, 2017 7:34 pm

Porterman wrote:
H4L wrote:Can't fault the effort today. All plans go straight out of the window. Ref and linesman have been a total disgrace. If Antonio take his chance at 0-0 who knows?


Doubtful if we would have got 2 better chances even with 11 men .

You have to take these chances whether it's 11 V 11 or anything else.

It's what the outcomes are decided by.


we would of wone tonite if not for them cunts
0 x

User avatar
palerider
Posts: 3471
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2016 8:35 am
Location: Somerset

Re: West Ham v Manchester Utd - Official Match Thread

Postby palerider » Mon Jan 02, 2017 7:35 pm

Porterman wrote:
H4L wrote:Can't fault the effort today. All plans go straight out of the window. Ref and linesman have been a total disgrace. If Antonio take his chance at 0-0 who knows?


Doubtful if we would have got 2 better chances even with 11 men .

You have to take these chances whether it's 11 V 11 or anything else.

It's what the outcomes are decided by.

It was yet more evidence why we have to buy a goalscorer.
0 x
It's not the principle. It's the money.

User avatar
Nibbles
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 3:13 pm
Location: Dresden

Re : West Ham v Manchester Utd - Official Match Thread

Postby Nibbles » Mon Jan 02, 2017 7:37 pm

Yep!
0 x

User avatar
Porterman
Posts: 1683
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2016 8:49 am

Re: West Ham v Manchester Utd - Official Match Thread

Postby Porterman » Mon Jan 02, 2017 7:37 pm

IRON-MAN ⚒ wrote:
Porterman wrote:
H4L wrote:Can't fault the effort today. All plans go straight out of the window. Ref and linesman have been a total disgrace. If Antonio take his chance at 0-0 who knows?


Doubtful if we would have got 2 better chances even with 11 men .

You have to take these chances whether it's 11 V 11 or anything else.

It's what the outcomes are decided by.


we would of wone tonite if not for them cunts


It's one of thps things you obviously will never know.

It actually seemed to affect the Man U almost as much as they were almost embarrassed by the decision!!
0 x

User avatar
Chicken Runner
Posts: 365
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 12:02 pm

Re: West Ham v Manchester Utd - Official Match Thread

Postby Chicken Runner » Mon Jan 02, 2017 7:38 pm

punkrockhammer wrote:Three offside for that goal, then

As bent as any League in the world

It has to be fixed. That's the only answer for a decision like that. WTF!!
1 x

User avatar
Porterman
Posts: 1683
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2016 8:49 am

Re: West Ham v Manchester Utd - Official Match Thread

Postby Porterman » Mon Jan 02, 2017 7:40 pm

palerider wrote:
Porterman wrote:
H4L wrote:Can't fault the effort today. All plans go straight out of the window. Ref and linesman have been a total disgrace. If Antonio take his chance at 0-0 who knows?


Doubtful if we would have got 2 better chances even with 11 men .

You have to take these chances whether it's 11 V 11 or anything else.

It's what the outcomes are decided by.

It was yet more evidence why we have to buy a goalscorer.


Who would you want better in front of goals than the man who has scored 6(?) headers this season?

They all miss them.

Would like to have seen Defoe running in for that one to one...But apparently he would not be welcome back!!!
0 x

User avatar
belfasthammer
Posts: 1726
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2016 4:02 pm

Re: West Ham v Manchester Utd - Official Match Thread

Postby belfasthammer » Mon Jan 02, 2017 7:46 pm

Thought the team put in a hard shift and did us proud Red card ruined the game but very unlucky
3 x

User avatar
palerider
Posts: 3471
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2016 8:35 am
Location: Somerset

Re: West Ham v Manchester Utd - Official Match Thread

Postby palerider » Mon Jan 02, 2017 7:48 pm

Porterman wrote:
palerider wrote:
Porterman wrote:
Doubtful if we would have got 2 better chances even with 11 men .

You have to take these chances whether it's 11 V 11 or anything else.

It's what the outcomes are decided by.

It was yet more evidence why we have to buy a goalscorer.


Who would you want better in front of goals than the man who has scored 6(?) headers this season?

They all miss them.

Would like to have seen Defoe running in for that one to one...But apparently he would not be welcome back!!!

He would by me mate.

But it's very unlikely.
0 x
It's not the principle. It's the money.


Return to “Match Day Threads”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests