F1, 2019

News, Banter and anything else non football!!
User avatar
Noni
Posts: 2573
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:20 pm
x 392
x 65

Re: F1, 2019

Post by Noni » Sat Jan 26, 2019 4:05 pm

Neville Bartos wrote:
Sat Jan 26, 2019 9:37 am
I thought this was a joke...

https://inews.co.uk/news/uk/read-lewis- ... ess-diana/

Imagine being so full of yourself you'd write that, read it a few times, and still put it out there for everyone to see. Fuck me.
Personally I don't mind it.

She was one of the most loved people out of the Royals, along with the Queen and Queen mother.

;)
0 x

User avatar
Noni
Posts: 2573
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:20 pm
x 392
x 65

Re: F1, 2019

Post by Noni » Mon Jan 28, 2019 4:19 pm

Eddie Irvine claims he's the best since Schumacher, what a load of crap!!! :shock:

http://f1i.com/news/328507-humble-irvin ... acher.html

He's the European version of Jacques Villeneuve IMO, full of bullshit and likes to stir the pot!...
0 x

User avatar
Gandalf
Posts: 264
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2017 9:00 pm
x 23
x 30

Re: F1, 2019

Post by Gandalf » Mon Jan 28, 2019 7:45 pm

Noni wrote:
Mon Jan 28, 2019 4:19 pm
Eddie Irvine claims he's the best since Schumacher, what a load of crap!!! :shock:

http://f1i.com/news/328507-humble-irvin ... acher.html

He's the European version of Jacques Villeneuve IMO, full of bullshit and likes to stir the pot!...

I was reading an interview with him on bbc.com. It was irritating me too.


"Lewis Hamilton is the best driver of this era, but.. "isn't even close" to Michael Schumacher".

Hamilton has had five team mates, two of whom were World Champions, plus Rosberg who became World Champion. Schumacher had one, Nelson Piquet in his last season in F1 and way past his best, and Nico Rosberg who comprehensively beat Schumacher in their three years together.
If you pick just Schumachers golden years (title-winning years plus those in between) Irvine, Barrichello and Massa would be the best of them. Hardly any world beaters in there!


"Vettel, when he is racing is someone, is focused as much on the other guy as he is on where he is going and inevitably crashes into the other guy, which happens nearly all the time".

I'm not a Vettel fan, but this is nonsense!!


"Michael was on it every day, like Senna, but Lewis has his off days. If you look over the two years Lewis and (Jenson) Button were together, Button actually outscored him over two years. No-one ever did that to Michael".

Err... how about Nico Rosberg? Three years in a row.

True, no team mate ever beat Schumacher in a Ferrari. But I wonder why, Eddie?


I used to like Irvine. And I do understand that a spoken interview doesn't always come across in the same way when written down. So I hope he comes out and clarifies some of these remarks in the coming days. Otherwise he will have lost a lot of respect.
1 x

User avatar
Neville Bartos
Posts: 3784
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 2:29 am
Location: Flyyyyyyyyyin'
x 344
x 451

Re: F1, 2019

Post by Neville Bartos » Tue Jan 29, 2019 2:01 am



You don't see just how big that elevation change is watching the Monaco GP these days.



Hill, Stewart, Clarke, Surtees, Brabham. And although he's not mentioned I'm sure I saw Jochen Rindt in there too. I love this old footage.
2 x
Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society; all that it does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the labour of others by means of such appropriations.

User avatar
Gandalf
Posts: 264
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2017 9:00 pm
x 23
x 30

Re: F1, 2019

Post by Gandalf » Sat Feb 16, 2019 6:54 am

0 x

User avatar
Gandalf
Posts: 264
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2017 9:00 pm
x 23
x 30

Re: F1, 2019

Post by Gandalf » Sat Feb 16, 2019 8:03 am

I've had a look back through some of the pre-season comments from last year and compared them to how the season panned out. It makes some interesting reading.


Re: Williams

The new Williams car will be the first under the leadership of Paddy Lowe. So I'm expecting a good car, and we know it will have a great engine. But will they be able to develop it throughout the season, given the inexperience of their driver line-up?

Well my concerns about the inexperienced driver line-up struggling with development proved correct. But my expectations of Paddy Lowe's first car were a little wide of the mark! (Completely wrong! :lol: )


Re: Force India

Force India (or whatever they will be called this year?) always work wonders with a small budget. But I fear they will be jumped by McLaren and Renault this year.

Although the final standings says I was right, the only reason McLaren finished above them was due to the fact Force India lost all their points mid-season. Yet again they worked wonders on a small budget.


Re: Haas

Haas struggled last year as the season went on, but that was in part due to starting work on the 2018 car very early. Maybe they will reap the benefits of that this season.

I should have been bang-on with this one. They produced a fantastic car. But due to the antics of Grosjean they didn't reap the benefits. Not until the 9th race of the season did he score any points.


Re: Sauber

As for Sauber, last year their chassis wasn't bad (it never is) but they struggled because of year-old engines. That problem has been solved now. It looks like their management turmoils have been sorted, and they have new investment (although that may benefit next year more than this). They could spring a surprise or two.

Bang-on with this one. It was a great car. But sadly only in the hands of one driver though.

I'm also expecting a good inter-team battle. Ericsson MUST beat Leclerc or his F1 career is finished. But Leclerc has talent in abundance and I don't think he will struggle in the same way that Stroll did.

In term of a good inter-team battle - Completely wrong! Leclerc did show his class though.


RE: McLaren

One theory that was doing the rounds is that last season McLaren ran with a lot of downforce to make the cars look good in the corners, therefore making the chassis look good, knowing they could simply blame Honda for them being slow in the straight, when in actual fact it was the drag that was contributing to them being slow.
This year they can't do that. It should be a straight fight between them and Red Bull. This should be an interesting battle. Hopefully the late engine switch and the inevitable packaging compromise won't hinder them too much. It looks like they've abandoned the size zero philosophy they had with the Honda in the back.
It's looking like the battle between McLaren and Red Bull will be one of a number of interesting sub-plots this season.


Very wrong. And I guess the rumours were right.


Re: Mercedes

Mercedes' approach this year is surprising and a little concerning.
Look at the season last year. It's fair to say that Ferrari threw it away as much as Mercedes won it. After the break Ferrari just imploded with reliability issues and Seb and his hotheadedness.
At the start of the season Ferrari clearly had the better all-round car. Mercedes had the 'Diva'. But neither car was optimized perfectly for the new regulations. Mercedes went for the long wheelbase, and most observers feel they went too long. And Ferrari went for the short wheelbase, and went too short. The optimum wheelbase was somewhere between the two.
This year Ferrari have lengthened their wheelbase. So straight away this gives them room for improvement, even if you don't see that straight away.
They introduced a new sidepod design last year, shorter with split intakes, which other teams have copied this year. All the proof you need that it works. And this year they've taken it a step further.
They've also incorporated the McLaren style front wing supports which are also being seen up and down the pitlane. And they've even got some nice trick aerodynamic wing mirrors. :D Ok, those alone won't have a great impact but it's great attention to detail.
All-in-all it's a step up from what they had last year.

Then look at the Mercedes and ask yourself "What have they done?". As far as I can see, not a lot! They've taken last years car and ironed out all the flaws. But they've stuck with the long wheelbase. And they haven't incorporated any of the successful ideas from other cars.
Taking a great car and making it better - there's some sense in that. But it doesn't give them the scope for improvement over the season that Ferrari have given themselves.

Although Mercedes walked away with both titles (again) I do think my concerns about their car were correct. For much of the season they didn't have the fastest car. But they won, partly due to Hamilton's heroics (why he still has detractors baffles me!) and partly due to Seb and the Ferrari manamgent throwing it away.


RE: Ferrari

So this year I'm going to say will be Ferrari's year

Wrong. But glad to be wrong! :D


And finally, back to Williams:

Claire Williams: 'We can't finish P5 or lower this year'
:roll: :lol:

I was laughing then, and I'm still laugh now! :lol:
Claire, this year is Last Chance Saloon for you.
0 x

User avatar
BillyDWhizz
Posts: 2954
Joined: Sat May 28, 2016 7:34 pm
x 68
x 206

Re: F1, 2019

Post by BillyDWhizz » Sat Feb 16, 2019 12:38 pm

Neville Bartos wrote:
Tue Jan 29, 2019 2:01 am


You don't see just how big that elevation change is watching the Monaco GP these days.



Hill, Stewart, Clarke, Surtees, Brabham. And although he's not mentioned I'm sure I saw Jochen Rindt in there too. I love this old footage.
My dad used to go on about Jim Clark saying he was, by a distance the best racing driver of his era and was on an ability level equal to that of Fangio. Obviously I'm too young to have seen him race and was always sceptical having grown up with the likes of Prost, Senna and Schumacher but there was an actually decent Clarkson segment about him on the Grand Tour the other day and it really made a solid case that Clarke was possibly the best ever.
0 x
Rounding to the nearest whole numbers makes them pointless.

User avatar
Neville Bartos
Posts: 3784
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 2:29 am
Location: Flyyyyyyyyyin'
x 344
x 451

Re: F1, 2019

Post by Neville Bartos » Sat Feb 16, 2019 1:04 pm

BillyDWhizz wrote:
Sat Feb 16, 2019 12:38 pm
Neville Bartos wrote:
Tue Jan 29, 2019 2:01 am


You don't see just how big that elevation change is watching the Monaco GP these days.



Hill, Stewart, Clarke, Surtees, Brabham. And although he's not mentioned I'm sure I saw Jochen Rindt in there too. I love this old footage.
My dad used to go on about Jim Clark saying he was, by a distance the best racing driver of his era and was on an ability level equal to that of Fangio. Obviously I'm too young to have seen him race and was always sceptical having grown up with the likes of Prost, Senna and Schumacher but there was an actually decent Clarkson segment about him on the Grand Tour the other day and it really made a solid case that Clarke was possibly the best ever.
Clark is certainly up there with Senna and Fangio in that best ever argument.
I always rate Schumacher a rung below because although his career was bookended by Hakkinen and Alonso there wasn't a huge amount of driver talent either opposing him or beside him. In fact Schumacher's era saw two of the most ordinary world champions ever in Hill and Villeneuve.
2 x
Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society; all that it does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the labour of others by means of such appropriations.

User avatar
Gandalf
Posts: 264
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2017 9:00 pm
x 23
x 30

Re: F1, 2019

Post by Gandalf » Thu Feb 28, 2019 6:29 am

1 x

User avatar
Noni
Posts: 2573
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:20 pm
x 392
x 65

Re: F1, 2019

Post by Noni » Fri Mar 01, 2019 7:55 pm

Both Ferrari and Red Bull had reliability issues on the last day of week 2 of testing. Though Mercedes have saved the best to last put Hamilton and Bottas 2nd and 3rd on the time sheets, with Hamilton only fractions of Vettel's top time.

Both Renault and McLaren are looking good as well.

One more week of testing before the 1st race begins in Australia. The middle of March. :)
0 x

Post Reply

Social Media