BillyDWhizz wrote: ↑
Fri Apr 05, 2019 7:12 pm
BlackDiamond wrote: ↑
Fri Apr 05, 2019 6:58 pm
So basically, disruptor at the BBC, leaves corporation and becomes No 10 Communication chief. I understand what the implication is, but it's all a bit thin and tangential.
I suspect this is copy and paste by the Canary - it certainly reads like it
Granted, but as you say the implication is there so surely it needs to be investigated thoroughly no?
Normalising or Scaremongering....take yer pick....
Telling people to look at leaving positively,see potential benefits...OR
Telling people, Society will collapse,no food,no drugs for treatment,wages will crash,unemployment
will rocket,ports will be at a stand still,as will be our motorways,no one can enter the UK anymore,
our ex pats will have their homes confiscated and sent back to the UK,could fill 5 pages on here of
all the scaremongering shit...the BBC and other Media outlets bang on about....
Bad News sells and gets viewers,they don't do positivity...the coverage of Brexit has been crap,
across the board,Sky are as bad,it's all about slagging things of,putting things down,the negatives,
so they will naturally fall down on the side of and give the impression of being Remainers...
whether they actually are or not...
Have you seen one thing where the positives of Brexit have been properly discussed,the potential
for free trade....to set our own laws....not gonna go into a Pro Brexit Rant...but there's
nothing putting that point of view forward,80% of the reporting is negative on it.
The prob is they approach every story,with the idea of putting a Bad spin on it,an MP might change
his/her mind after seeing a compromise somewhere...and it's.. they're backing down,going against
They've totally lost the plot when it comes to impartial fair reporting..
If I based my vote/opinion on the reporting of it....there's not a bloody chance I'd want to leave..