The problem with your argument BD bout the clique thing,why would they allow...yes I mean allow..BlackDiamond wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2019 1:01 pmThis has never been about what the people want. It is about what a small clique have decided is best for their interests. It's only them.Them.
The claims of law,rules,the wider community are all now servants of selfish appetites.
A strange message was communicated with Trump's support for suspending parliament...it suggested, you can have what you want. Immersion in that philosophy is so attractive because it rewards the most venal.
We are not being so much, led down the garden path but being asked to form an honour guard either side of it.
(They do exist and much more powerful than most of us know as well,but they don't sit in parliament)
Cameron to set up a public vote,which the world and his wife thought was gonna be a pretty strong
It was just simply a manifesto vote winner...that went wrong or right depends how you look at it.
But to put Something as important as that to the Public,must always be the way...something a Labour
Controlled Parliament would never do.
This clique you refer to...it's irrelevant to them if we remain or stay....they make their money either
way,the art is having people in government,that are in with them...not against them.
Like it or not Money rules always has done...always will,we have to acknowledge that...
A Government in power that they have a say in,they'll invest and stay with us...
A Corbyn led leftie Government,they slowly ease their money out of the country,and the downward
spiral begins...till the Tories get back in power,and have to spend the first 3 years in control
getting things on a firm financial footing again.
Dont hate the rich it's pointless.....get them on your side...cos they will always always win...