Neville Bartos wrote: ↑
Mon Aug 05, 2019 5:26 pm
mkhammer wrote: ↑
Mon Aug 05, 2019 3:44 pm
Well that was a disgrace....all I got to say really.......
What a fuckin let down...
128/8....get shot of Warner and their first 3 for next to nothing..both innings...and still get smashed.
That was the key moment on day one, mate. If we'd have rolled them over for 150, and got a 220 run lead instead of 90 odd, the pressure would've done the rest. As it was 90 behind they must have felt like they were let off the hook.
People can praise Smith all they want, but the fact is he was batting with a ten and jack.
Yeah,absolutely...even with Smith doing what he did,it's no excuse for not winning that...
Think Losing your main strike bowler,was bigger influence,and picking a vastly outta form
spinner...oh and a couple of our batsman thinking their still playing World cup one dayers...
TBH...considering everything thought the 90 Lead was OK....better than I thought was gonna be..
I really thought getting Warner and the openers so easily,the match would open up for us,the
middle order should be our strength not theirs..
Hoping a bit, that was a one off...Get Archer and Leach in...(Warne seemed to reckon Leach might
cause Smith a few Probs,great listening to him,when commentating))
Lords not really an overly happy hunting ground for us,much as I love the place..don't wanna
go 2 down..