Jonathan Pie.

News, Banter and anything else non football!!
User avatar
Neville Bartos
Posts: 2175
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 2:29 am
Location: Flyyyyyyyyyin'

Re: Jonathan Pie.

Postby Neville Bartos » Fri Apr 20, 2018 10:49 pm

Fuck me. It's that gender pay gap argument for real... Stella Creasy can fuck right off, arrogant, privileged cow. :D

0 x
Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society; all that it does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the labour of others by means of such appropriations.

User avatar
Gonzo
Posts: 5784
Joined: Sat May 28, 2016 8:13 pm

Re: Jonathan Pie.

Postby Gonzo » Sat Apr 21, 2018 8:06 pm

Neville Bartos wrote:Fuck me. It's that gender pay gap argument for real... Stella Creasy can fuck right off, arrogant, privileged cow. :D





Thanks for that mate, more conspiratorial nonsense.

There was a professor on the radio last week who's stem cell research lab fell into the category of gender pay gap.

The 5 experts (professors, PHD's, Masters) in the company were all men. The remaining analysts and lab assistants were made up equally of men and women and there was complete pay parity. Clearly the 5 most qualified/experts earned more than the lab assistants.

The radio host asked the guest why none of the top jobs were held by women and he responded by saying that none were available to recruit. He said that last years intake at University was 95% male and that ratio was reflected in the Uni applications too.

He went on to explain that over the last three years only one qualified female has become available for interview and she eventually went to work for the University itself. When pressed to explain why he said that women are just not particularly interested in that field of science. They tended to gravitate towards other sciences and used the example of the gender balance at Surrey University where they specialise in cosmology (which attracts far more female applicants).

The radio asked if there was some sort of affirmative action required to get girls involved but the professor said that was madness. They were trying to cure cancer and he needed the brightest and best available. If they were forced to 'box-tick' then it would hinder and slow their cancer research because they would be hiring unqualified people.

That's just one story and when explained it's understandable why men are earning more money at the lab. However it's viewed by people like Miss Smartie Pants as a genter pay gap and some sort of conspiracy theory.
0 x

User avatar
Neville Bartos
Posts: 2175
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 2:29 am
Location: Flyyyyyyyyyin'

Re: Jonathan Pie.

Postby Neville Bartos » Sat Apr 21, 2018 9:17 pm

Gonzo wrote:
Neville Bartos wrote:Fuck me. It's that gender pay gap argument for real... Stella Creasy can fuck right off, arrogant, privileged cow. :D





Thanks for that mate, more conspiratorial nonsense.

There was a professor on the radio last week who's stem cell research lab fell into the category of gender pay gap.

The 5 experts (professors, PHD's, Masters) in the company were all men. The remaining analysts and lab assistants were made up equally of men and women and there was complete pay parity. Clearly the 5 most qualified/experts earned more than the lab assistants.

The radio host asked the guest why none of the top jobs were held by women and he responded by saying that none were available to recruit. He said that last years intake at University was 95% male and that ratio was reflected in the Uni applications too.

He went on to explain that over the last three years only one qualified female has become available for interview and she eventually went to work for the University itself. When pressed to explain why he said that women are just not particularly interested in that field of science. They tended to gravitate towards other sciences and used the example of the gender balance at Surrey University where they specialise in cosmology (which attracts far more female applicants).

The radio asked if there was some sort of affirmative action required to get girls involved but the professor said that was madness. They were trying to cure cancer and he needed the brightest and best available. If they were forced to 'box-tick' then it would hinder and slow their cancer research because they would be hiring unqualified people.

That's just one story and when explained it's understandable why men are earning more money at the lab. However it's viewed by people like Miss Smartie Pants as a genter pay gap and some sort of conspiracy theory.


Absolutely right, Gonzo. The vast majority of the time these pay gap issues rarely standup to any reasonable scrutiny.
This stuff is being pushed so hard without any real context you do wonder what the end game is.
If it's absolute, fundamental, equality at any price, you'd absolutely have to question that.
0 x
Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society; all that it does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the labour of others by means of such appropriations.

User avatar
Gonzo
Posts: 5784
Joined: Sat May 28, 2016 8:13 pm

Re: Jonathan Pie.

Postby Gonzo » Sat Apr 21, 2018 9:26 pm

Neville Bartos wrote:
Gonzo wrote:


Thanks for that mate, more conspiratorial nonsense.

There was a professor on the radio last week who's stem cell research lab fell into the category of gender pay gap.

The 5 experts (professors, PHD's, Masters) in the company were all men. The remaining analysts and lab assistants were made up equally of men and women and there was complete pay parity. Clearly the 5 most qualified/experts earned more than the lab assistants.

The radio host asked the guest why none of the top jobs were held by women and he responded by saying that none were available to recruit. He said that last years intake at University was 95% male and that ratio was reflected in the Uni applications too.

He went on to explain that over the last three years only one qualified female has become available for interview and she eventually went to work for the University itself. When pressed to explain why he said that women are just not particularly interested in that field of science. They tended to gravitate towards other sciences and used the example of the gender balance at Surrey University where they specialise in cosmology (which attracts far more female applicants).

The radio asked if there was some sort of affirmative action required to get girls involved but the professor said that was madness. They were trying to cure cancer and he needed the brightest and best available. If they were forced to 'box-tick' then it would hinder and slow their cancer research because they would be hiring unqualified people.

That's just one story and when explained it's understandable why men are earning more money at the lab. However it's viewed by people like Miss Smartie Pants as a genter pay gap and some sort of conspiracy theory.


Absolutely right, Gonzo. The vast majority of the time these pay gap issues rarely standup to any reasonable scrutiny.
This stuff is being pushed so hard without any real context you do wonder what the end game is.
If it's absolute, fundamental, equality at any price, you'd absolutely have to question that.



I'm not sure that the participants are smart enough to have thought of the end game mate. I think that they are all so wrapped up in their own little niche that they fail to see the real damage and bigger picture.

No sensible person would deny a male doctor and female doctor pay parity and the same goes for the same job in any category. My missus is a midwife which is female dominated and rightly so, unfortunately much like all gender propoganda it denies the truth that men and women have differences and preferences.
0 x

User avatar
Neville Bartos
Posts: 2175
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 2:29 am
Location: Flyyyyyyyyyin'

Re: Jonathan Pie.

Postby Neville Bartos » Sat Apr 21, 2018 9:50 pm

Gonzo wrote:
Neville Bartos wrote:
Absolutely right, Gonzo. The vast majority of the time these pay gap issues rarely standup to any reasonable scrutiny.
This stuff is being pushed so hard without any real context you do wonder what the end game is.
If it's absolute, fundamental, equality at any price, you'd absolutely have to question that.



I'm not sure that the participants are smart enough to have thought of the end game mate. I think that they are all so wrapped up in their own little niche that they fail to see the real damage and bigger picture.

No sensible person would deny a male doctor and female doctor pay parity and the same goes for the same job in any category. My missus is a midwife which is female dominated and rightly so, unfortunately much like all gender propoganda it denies the truth that men and women have differences and preferences.


Can't disagree mate. It just seems a fact of life that men and women have different attitudes and ambitions when it comes to work.

I read a story about someone suing Tesco because working on the checkouts paid less than working in the warehouse. And since most warehouse workers were men, it was somehow discrimination. Never mind that men working the checkouts got paid the same rate as women.
Head scratching stuff, imo.
1 x
Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society; all that it does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the labour of others by means of such appropriations.

User avatar
Dicksies Diner
Posts: 506
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2017 11:28 am

Re: Jonathan Pie.

Postby Dicksies Diner » Sun Apr 22, 2018 8:19 am

Neville Bartos wrote:He might be just a 'comedy' character, but fuck me if he's not spot on.



Count Dankula is innocent.
0 x
Love,peace and harmony to all Hammers.
Fuck the board.

User avatar
Gonzo
Posts: 5784
Joined: Sat May 28, 2016 8:13 pm

Re: Jonathan Pie.

Postby Gonzo » Sun Apr 22, 2018 10:43 am

Neville Bartos wrote:
Gonzo wrote:

I'm not sure that the participants are smart enough to have thought of the end game mate. I think that they are all so wrapped up in their own little niche that they fail to see the real damage and bigger picture.

No sensible person would deny a male doctor and female doctor pay parity and the same goes for the same job in any category. My missus is a midwife which is female dominated and rightly so, unfortunately much like all gender propoganda it denies the truth that men and women have differences and preferences.


Can't disagree mate. It just seems a fact of life that men and women have different attitudes and ambitions when it comes to work.

I read a story about someone suing Tesco because working on the checkouts paid less than working in the warehouse. And since most warehouse workers were men, it was somehow discrimination. Never mind that men working the checkouts got paid the same rate as women.
Head scratching stuff, imo.



Indeed, Lab assistants paid the same as scientists, the same wage across the board at a supermarket regardless if the job . . . . . starting to sound like a familiar political ideology.
0 x

User avatar
Marco Boogers Boots
Posts: 291
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2017 7:48 am
Location: Muscat, Sultanate of Oman

Re: Jonathan Pie.

Postby Marco Boogers Boots » Tue May 08, 2018 4:20 am



0 x

User avatar
Neville Bartos
Posts: 2175
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 2:29 am
Location: Flyyyyyyyyyin'

Re: Jonathan Pie.

Postby Neville Bartos » Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:45 pm

Pie for PM. He just nails it every time.
1 x
Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society; all that it does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the labour of others by means of such appropriations.

User avatar
Marco Boogers Boots
Posts: 291
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2017 7:48 am
Location: Muscat, Sultanate of Oman

Re: Jonathan Pie.

Postby Marco Boogers Boots » Wed Jun 20, 2018 4:30 am

Already posted this in the British politics thread, you cunt.

But then, that's probably the wrong thread. I'm a cunt.

We are both cunts.
1 x


Return to “Topical Topics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests