Randolph v Adrian

Chat about anything football related here!
User avatar
Whiskyman
Posts: 19680
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:05 pm
x 563
x 2464

Re: Randolph v Adrian

Post by Whiskyman »

Imo Adrian has only been directly responsible for one goal this season and in our most recent humbling was responsible for the score not reaching 5 or 6.

Agreed he has on occasions looked unsure of himself but imo Manuel Neuer would probably have palpitations every time the ball came into our half if he was in our goal, given the way we defended against Saints and, more spectacularly (4th goal anyone) at The Hawthorns.

Randolph is a very good number 2 but, imo, that is exactly what he is.
Why Is There Only One Monopolies Commission. Isn't That A Monopoly?

User avatar
ToneLoc
Posts: 9669
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2016 2:21 pm
x 226
x 359

Re: Randolph v Adrian

Post by ToneLoc »

Whiskyman wrote:Imo Adrian has only been directly responsible for one goal this season and in our most recent humbling was responsible for the score not reaching 5 or 6.

Agreed he has on occasions looked unsure of himself but imo Manuel Neuer would probably have palpitations every time the ball came into our half if he was in our goal, given the way we defended against Saints and, more spectacularly (4th goal anyone) at The Hawthorns.

Randolph is a very good number 2 but, imo, that is exactly what he is.
His distribution is currently pants though imo.
Although there weren't many, there WERE times yesterday where Adrian could have drilled a good throw to Antonio or Payet yet he just lumped the ball up the pitch.
And I've found myself lamenting this on more than one occasion this season.
Fancy calling your only son "Barnestoneworth"
He's got another name....
Yeah....."United"

Post Reply