All of em . And I’ve never been that keen on getting players from those deluded Cunts either tbh
Agree, however Zamora is an exception for me.
Not Etherington too? Or Sherringham? Both those were sheer class, surely.....?? When I saw how brilliant Sherringham was, even in his late 30's, I swell with pride, frankly. He was such an intelligent player.... Brilliant player....
I didn't give a stuff where he came from; it is what he did for us ....by the bucketful...
Ditto Etherington....fantastic player...wasn't he? Why does it matter so much where he came from, when he gave his all for the cause?
FatPigIron wrote: ↑Sun Apr 12, 2020 3:05 pm
Simple question: Why Scott Parker was hated for going to Spurs, yet Carrick wasn't?
By me he was .
So was Peters god rest his soul.
You might have hated the lot of them, but don't you think there was a vast difference between how Parker and Carrick were treated? I don't remember Carrick ever getting boo-ed..... With Parker it was really venomous... So why the difference?
You might have hated the lot of them, but don't you think there was a vast difference between how Parker and Carrick were treated? I don't remember Carrick ever getting boo-ed..... With Parker it was really venomous... So why the difference?
Because Carrick stayed when we went down, he gave us a season. Parker asked to leave big difference.
And Zamora was a West Ham boy.
It’s not what you do it is the way that you do it.
You might have hated the lot of them, but don't you think there was a vast difference between how Parker and Carrick were treated? I don't remember Carrick ever getting boo-ed..... With Parker it was really venomous... So why the difference?
Because Carrick stayed when we went down, he gave us a season. Parker asked to leave big difference.
And Zamora was a West Ham boy.
Exactly..Spot on...Was just going to say the same thing.
You might have hated the lot of them, but don't you think there was a vast difference between how Parker and Carrick were treated? I don't remember Carrick ever getting boo-ed..... With Parker it was really venomous... So why the difference?
When and where was it "really venomous"?
Not sure any WHU person I know "hates" Parker for moving to the Spuds.
Fancy calling your only son "Barnestoneworth"
He's got another name....
Yeah....."United"
FatPigIron wrote: ↑Sun Apr 12, 2020 3:05 pm
Simple question: Why Scott Parker was hated for going to Spurs, yet Carrick wasn't?
Was he hated?
Not sure I remember that tbh.
Well, I'm not responsible for your memory! He was vilified. It was nasty:
He was with us 4 years, and got Hammer of the Year for 3 of them. If ever any player tried to keep us up, it was him, winning Journalist Player of the Year; unprecedented in for a player in a relegated team.
Yet, when he returned in a Spurs shirt he was profoundly boo-ed. I was there. Parker was really upset afterwards as reported in the Daily Mail (I think).
I think there is still a lot of hatred to this day.
