Page 11 of 13

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2022 4:29 pm
by dagenhamdave
If he had signed for us I would have given him his fucking watch back. :lol:

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2022 4:34 pm
by Dwayne Pipes
Is seriously considering to have Jlingz put on the back of his fucking shirt.

Geezers a complete cunt.

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2022 4:42 pm
by palerider
hd1 wrote: Sat Jul 23, 2022 4:20 pm
tassiehammer wrote: Fri Jul 22, 2022 2:32 am

Maybe those with the money weren't obsessed as Moyes.
Nope, it was Moyes that did not want the wage structure broken
Not what I heard.

Moyes was willing to go as high as 250k pw, 6 new watches a month, and a petition to HM for a knighthood for him.


Arise Sir Jlingz.

Has a ring to it.

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2022 5:06 pm
by OZHAMMER
palerider wrote: Sat Jul 23, 2022 4:42 pm
hd1 wrote: Sat Jul 23, 2022 4:20 pm

Nope, it was Moyes that did not want the wage structure broken
Not what I heard.

Moyes was willing to go as high as 250k pw, 6 new watches a month, and a petition to HM for a knighthood for him.


Arise Sir Jlingz.

Has a ring to it.
An arsehole has a ring to it as well...

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2022 5:08 pm
by hd1
palerider wrote: Sat Jul 23, 2022 4:42 pm
hd1 wrote: Sat Jul 23, 2022 4:20 pm

Nope, it was Moyes that did not want the wage structure broken
Not what I heard.

Moyes was willing to go as high as 250k pw, 6 new watches a month, and a petition to HM for a knighthood for him.


Arise Sir Jlingz.

Has a ring to it.
You definitely heard wrong Pale 😁

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2022 5:38 pm
by h69
Dwayne Pipes wrote: Sat Jul 23, 2022 4:34 pm Is seriously considering to have Jlingz put on the back of his fucking shirt.

Geezers a complete cunt.
Yes. Rvel Morrison 2.0 but with better teeth

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2022 5:55 pm
by BlackDiamond
h69 wrote: Sat Jul 23, 2022 5:38 pm
Dwayne Pipes wrote: Sat Jul 23, 2022 4:34 pm Is seriously considering to have Jlingz put on the back of his fucking shirt.

Geezers a complete cunt.
Yes. Rvel Morrison 2.0 but with better teeth
And looking where RM has ended up at DC, I reckon JLinz spoke to Wazza and it was agreed, he would have one lucrative year at Nottingham Forest and then off to the MSL - all bums chums together

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2022 7:01 pm
by eskimo joe
BlackDiamond wrote: Sat Jul 23, 2022 5:55 pm
h69 wrote: Sat Jul 23, 2022 5:38 pm

Yes. Rvel Morrison 2.0 but with better teeth
And looking where RM has ended up at DC, I reckon JLinz spoke to Wazza and it was agreed, he would have one lucrative year at Nottingham Forest and then off to the MSL - all bums chums together
Got to say that thought occurred to me, but have to admit it was only after hearing, true or false, that we offered him a three year deal which accumulated more money. Thought it strange he would turn it down unless he had something up his sleeve.

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2022 4:52 am
by tassiehammer
hd1 wrote: Sat Jul 23, 2022 4:20 pm
tassiehammer wrote: Fri Jul 22, 2022 2:32 am

Maybe those with the money weren't obsessed as Moyes.
Nope, it was Moyes that did not want the wage structure broken
Where did you hear that? All sorts flying around. Another is that Moyes and the board have had a lovers tiff over not getting Lingard.

Re: Lingard

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2022 8:47 am
by Dwayne Pipes
Heard deal was done and dusted then the cunt reneged and wanted more money and was told politely to take it or leave it or fuck off.
Which he did the second option much to bug eyes dismay.