palerider wrote: ↑Mon Jan 18, 2021 8:06 am
The Messiah isn't the dullest manager in the league but he's in the top 6. Yet I suppose with the pragmatic view that staying up is the most important thing, he's ticking the boxes. But ffs, it's horrible to watch at times. But losing 5-4 is still nil points. So with a much-loved phrase I'll say be careful what you wish for. Mister Dead brought some thrills occasionally but was proof that without the bank-roll of an oil rich country he was fucking useless.
How do you define dullest though ? The press , and quite a few on here, are a long way up the arse of a certain Irishman whose team currently sits high in the league. They play pretty much the same style as we do but are fortunate to have Vardy and, to a lesser extent, Harvey Barnes up front. Neither of those players were brought to Leicester by the afore mentioned Bog Trotter btw, And yet there are those who knock Moyes for being dull who claim they would like to see him at our gaff. What sort of team, or performance, do they think he would produce with our squad ? No Vardy to aim for with a long whack over the defensive shield.
And although we have had some stinkers at home this season, standouts for me being Newcastle and Brighton, are we really a duller side than much of the other dross in the best league in the world ? Are we really a worse watch than the obvious suspects, Sheffield United, Burnley, Palace, Newcastle, Brighton,? Negative ? Did anyone see West Brom at Man City, under Bilic, or at Anfield, under Allardyce ? They didn't park the bus, they brought the whole fucking fleet. Even Spurs are getting pelters for their style under Mourinho.
How many sides really play this mythical "attractive" football people pine for ? Leeds are very gung ho and are a decent watch for the neutral but I've heard their fans moaning about how easy it is to score against them with their open style. I don't think my heart could take being a Leeds fan under Bielsa tbh. He got away with it against the crap they came up against in the Championship but have started to struggle with their open style now.
And now people have started saying we wouldn't get away with our style of football with a full house. Well, if the football is that bad why bother going ? When I used to go there were a very small number of people who just couldn't wait for the first misplaced pass , or missed chance, so they could vent their spleen but it seems that now there are a hell of a lot more who go because they actually enjoy having a gripe and a grizzle. Nothing to do with the stadium either, it started while we were still at our old gaff.
There's people here who've probably supported the club longer than me but in my time I can honestly say the only time we've had a team that has entertained consistently was the Brooking, Devonshire, Bonds era. We've had some good time since but more often than not because of individual talent rather than collective ability. DiCanio and Payet being probably the two most obvious examples. Sure, we've got Declan Rice now, but because of the role he plays he isn't producing the same flashes of creative genius the likes of the mad Italian and the chubby Frenchman were capable of.
For me it's no surprise our fans who were once regarded as some of the best around are now seen as whingeirs with an over exaggerated sense of where West Ham actually sit in football's pecking order. The West Ham way FFS. We haven't seen that for 35 fucking years.