Hammers Chat

OZHAMMER wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 9:22 pm

Towie wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 1:30 pm Man City and Chelsea next please.

Normally I would say “fuck yes”, but with City being docked points, it would usually mean either the Bindippers or Spuds are good chances for the title.

And to that I say “fuck that”.

Ibbyham wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 4:30 pm Hope Everton will LOSE their appeal. They must accept 10 points deducted due to poor handling on financial side. They did NOT learn lesson.

Hope Chelsea and Man City will be demoted for wrongdoing.

I never forgave Tottenham for winning 12 points deduction in 1995-96 season. That was very stupid of Alan Sugar who did wrong-doing and he is NOT fit to be a Lord as he is not a real person.

tassiehammer wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 8:37 pm

brookingslovechild wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 7:22 pm City 115 charges.
Everton 1 charge

1150 point deducted (if convicted of all).
Still think they win the league by 10points

Citeh legal eagles trying to do a deal as we speak. "We'll take a 10 point deduction and plead guilty and save you all the bother" . Knowing they'll still clean up

Whiskyman wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2023 9:22 am

tassiehammer wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 8:37 pm

Citeh legal eagles trying to do a deal as we speak. "We'll take a 10 point deduction and plead guilty and save you all the bother" . Knowing they'll still clean up

I'm waiting for the bidding to start for the rights to show the trial live on the box mate. Promises to be more entertaining than most of the crap they show. Can't you just imagine it ?

And now, over to the High Court where the prosecution is about to set out it's case, AND IT'S LIVE !!!

Wouldn't mind having a lirrle wager that Everton's deduction will be reduced and the "balance" suspended for a couple of seasons.

eskimo joe wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2023 12:39 pm By what i understand Everton seemed to try and pull the wool over the commisions eyes claiming that some of the debt came from infrastucture renewal. To me it sounds like the owners decided to put the charge on the club rather than their own pockets. Surely they werent that naive?!.

eskimo joe wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2023 12:39 pm By what i understand Everton seemed to try and pull the wool over the commisions eyes claiming that some of the debt came from infrastucture renewal. To me it sounds like the owners decided to put the charge on the club rather than their own pockets. Surely they werent that naive?!.

Whiskyman wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2023 9:22 am

tassiehammer wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 8:37 pm

Citeh legal eagles trying to do a deal as we speak. "We'll take a 10 point deduction and plead guilty and save you all the bother" . Knowing they'll still clean up

I'm waiting for the bidding to start for the rights to show the trial live on the box mate. Promises to be more entertaining than most of the crap they show. Can't you just imagine it ?

And now, over to the High Court where the prosecution is about to set out it's case, AND IT'S LIVE !!!

Wouldn't mind having a lirrle wager that Everton's deduction will be reduced and the "balance" suspended for a couple of seasons.

Whiskyman wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2023 8:05 pm

eskimo joe wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2023 12:39 pm By what i understand Everton seemed to try and pull the wool over the commisions eyes claiming that some of the debt came from infrastucture renewal. To me it sounds like the owners decided to put the charge on the club rather than their own pockets. Surely they werent that naive?!.

Don’t understand what you’re saying mate. Of course the stadium costs would be chatted to the club. The new stadium will be a club asset. Out of curiosity why did you expect the owners to swallow the cost.