redhammer wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2019 8:06 am
Done. The question on the board would have been more positive a month ago (not nec my choice but the overall results) than it is today with the price increases and crap budget
Same, and I'd add in the Wimbledon result (not directly the boards fault I know) and the arnie contract announcement straight after.
I'm feeling better about the stadium overall it must be said, but the questions about do I believe we've canbe top 6/4 in x number of years made the overall survey a bit negative (my response)
It's a shit survey. Questions like 'when will the LS feel like our proper home?' and then bracketing the answers into 3-5yrs, 6-10 yrs etc.. How the hell are you supposed to answer that? It depends on so many factors, ie; what the club does 2 improve things & when..
& 'After almost 3 years at the London Stadium do you believe that the move was a good idea?' Well, the IDEA of moving is not affected by how many years we've been there. I might think that the IDEA of moving was good, but find the experience poor and not enjoy matchdays very much. But after 3 years I would still think that the IDEA was good, but just that the Club fucked it up.
And someone on Twitter posted-
I think this is a poor survey, badly worded, here’s the perfect example, there are 3 questions in one, quality, price & choice, I personally have three different answers to this one question-
10. What is your view on the quality, choice and price of food and drink within the London Stadium?
I don't think I'm alone in thinking this survey is a bit SHIT. And so what if the results get sent to the Club? Won't make any difference. Just like this SAB, the Club claim to listen to fans but only change things if it fits with their agenda. If it ties in with what the fans want, they claim they acted on the fans wishes. bullshit!
