Don't believe a word of it to be honest but let's just say for arguments sake it's true. £65Million?? We should be biting their arm off at the shoulder for that. I like Anderson but that's a whole chunk of change. We could get Richarlison and still have £25M left over, which wouldn't be a bad bit of business imo. Really piss the Everton fans off as well, which would be a bonus.
Who the fuck is General Failure and why is he reading my harddisk?
BillyDWhizz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 8:51 pm
Don't believe a word of it to be honest but let's just say for arguments sake it's true. £65Million?? We should be biting their arm off at the shoulder for that. I like Anderson but that's a whole chunk of change. We could get Richarlison and still have £25M left over, which wouldn't be a bad bit of business imo. Really piss the Everton fans off as well, which would be a bonus.
So one inconsistent Brazilian for an even more consistent Brazilian?
No thanks. I think Anderson is at least a level above Richarlison when both at their best
Unless we sign Richarlison for a couple of months and then sell him on as he only seems to turn it on when he arrives at a club
Don’t know why you think they’d sell for what they paid, either. They would want a few mill profit on him at least. I doubt we’d end up any better off out of it at all
BillyDWhizz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 8:51 pm
Don't believe a word of it to be honest but let's just say for arguments sake it's true. £65Million?? We should be biting their arm off at the shoulder for that. I like Anderson but that's a whole chunk of change. We could get Richarlison and still have £25M left over, which wouldn't be a bad bit of business imo. Really piss the Everton fans off as well, which would be a bonus.
So one inconsistent Brazilian for an even more consistent Brazilian?
No thanks. I think Anderson is at least a level above Richarlison when both at their best
Unless we sign Richarlison for a couple of months and then sell him on as he only seems to turn it on when he arrives at a club
Don’t know why you think they’d sell for what they paid, either. They would want a few mill profit on him at least. I doubt we’d end up any better off out of it at all
Bale in return.
Only as it would piss-off the skinless ones.
They'd have to pay two-thirds of his wages as well though.
Can't see why they'd be interested in Anderson but hey ho they signed Faubert at one point so who knows.
Anderson is a terriffic player but severly inconsistent - imo he should have been subbed off far more than he has been this season. Sometimes he can take off in the second half but you can usually tell when he's having an off day.
So one inconsistent Brazilian for an even more consistent Brazilian?
No thanks. I think Anderson is at least a level above Richarlison when both at their best
Unless we sign Richarlison for a couple of months and then sell him on as he only seems to turn it on when he arrives at a club
Don’t know why you think they’d sell for what they paid, either. They would want a few mill profit on him at least. I doubt we’d end up any better off out of it at all
Bale in return.
Only as it would piss-off the skinless ones.
They'd have to pay two-thirds of his wages as well though.
I’d love to take Bale in exchange, even if he is a bit of a sick note
As you suggest though, never gonna happen but it would be a statement of intent to players like Rice and piss off the spuds
BillyDWhizz wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 8:51 pm
Don't believe a word of it to be honest but let's just say for arguments sake it's true. £65Million?? We should be biting their arm off at the shoulder for that. I like Anderson but that's a whole chunk of change. We could get Richarlison and still have £25M left over, which wouldn't be a bad bit of business imo. Really piss the Everton fans off as well, which would be a bonus.
So one inconsistent Brazilian for an even more consistent Brazilian?
No thanks. I think Anderson is at least a level above Richarlison when both at their best
Unless we sign Richarlison for a couple of months and then sell him on as he only seems to turn it on when he arrives at a club
Don’t know why you think they’d sell for what they paid, either. They would want a few mill profit on him at least. I doubt we’d end up any better off out of it at all
Agree with that. Imo Anderson is better than Richarlison. Although if we got a £65 million offer I'd certainly conside4r it.
One Anderson for 2 1/2 Diops at last summer's rates.
Why Is There Only One Monopolies Commission. Isn't That A Monopoly?
