why dont you fuck off the forum and wank over your stack of kiddyporn you boring cunt.
Excellent post
How strange.
We know Caboose is Rambo so a post like that is expected.
But you to sign it off. Wow.
I take it you have children yet you like posts championing paedophilia.
Wow. I guess you like people posting about child porn.
I guess even some parents have strange tastes.
terrya1965 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 24, 2021 8:32 am
Excellent post
How strange.
We know Caboose is Rambo so a post like that is expected.
But you to sign it off. Wow.
I take it you have children yet you like posts championing paedophilia.
Wow. I guess you like people posting about child porn.
I guess even some parents have strange tastes.
F*CK OFF YOU PRAT...YOU ARE CROSSING A LINE.
Why are you mentioning my parents you sick c*nt?I would never ever mention your family.I don't mind you having a go at me,that`s fine,but when you get personal about my family..You have gone too far.
We know Caboose is Rambo so a post like that is expected.
But you to sign it off. Wow.
I take it you have children yet you like posts championing paedophilia.
Wow. I guess you like people posting about child porn.
I guess even some parents have strange tastes.
F*CK OFF YOU PRAT...YOU ARE CROSSING A LINE.
Why are you mentioning my parents you sick c*nt?I would never ever mention your family.I don't mind you having a go at me,that`s fine,but when you get personal about my family..You have gone too far.
DON'T EVER SPEAK TO ME AGAIN.
.
Your parents??!??!!
You are the one liking a post about a person mentioning child porn.
Read what you liked and read my post again.
The parents part was about YOU, as a parent, writing 'excellent post' when another poster says ' go and w### over child porn'
9898 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 23, 2021 9:45 pm
Watford eesult is a real buzz killer West Ham fans.
Don't win tomorrow and the start to the season begins to look poor.
why dont you fuck off the forum and wank over your stack of kiddyporn you boring cunt.
Really not sure why anyone would actually like your comment , I can understand numbers can be as annoying as Whiskyman but is there any real need to mention sexual reproduction , masturbation , paedophilia and parts of the women's anatomy ? .
palerider wrote: ↑Sat Oct 23, 2021 5:39 pm
Watford put some perspective on our win last week with Josh King showing the Messiah that he may have been worth a punt for fuck all.
And Naaaaaarch may struggle to make Europe.
And we beat Spurs who stuffed City on Day 1.
And Watford lost 5-0 to Liverpool last week with King in the side.
Previous results mean nothing. It is how the team you are playing turn up on the day.. Everton gave up when Watford equalised. They are not playing for the manager. The last goal even I could have scored.
palerider wrote: ↑Sat Oct 23, 2021 5:39 pm
Watford put some perspective on our win last week with Josh King showing the Messiah that he may have been worth a punt for fuck all.
And Naaaaaarch may struggle to make Europe.
And we beat Spurs who stuffed City on Day 1.
And Watford lost 5-0 to Liverpool last week with King in the side.
Previous results mean nothing. It is how the team you are playing turn up on the day.. Everton gave up when Watford equalised. They are not playing for the manager. The last goal even I could have scored.
Can you imagine the bleating from some of our fans if we had signed King in the summer. I'm sure a cursory glance at some of the threads will prove the point.
Why Is There Only One Monopolies Commission. Isn't That A Monopoly?
terrya1965 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 24, 2021 8:32 am
Excellent post
How strange.
We know Caboose is Rambo so a post like that is expected.
But you to sign it off. Wow.
I take it you have children yet you like posts championing paedophilia.
Wow. I guess you like people posting about child porn.
I guess even some parents have strange tastes.
Whaddya mean Rambo you fucking kiddy fiddling nonce. Do us all big favor slide under yer stone and die.
but is there any real need to mention sexual reproduction , masturbation , paedophilia and parts of the women's anatomy ? .
