Page 8 of 15
Re: Claret & Hugh Watch
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2022 6:24 pm
by JayK
andyginbrasil wrote: ↑Sat Mar 26, 2022 12:13 pm
C&H.....are obviously on the ball and have written an article on our youngsters various performances for their countries this International break.
But this one was a real eye opener
"Ben Johnson also played for the U21s against Andorra as Lee Carsley’s side won 4-1.
The game was notable for the fact that Johnson played as a centre-back, despite playing at right-back throughout his time with the Irons."
So well done Ben Johnson.....oh hang on..... Johnson was on the bench and didn't actually make it onto the pitch......
Classic....
Kin ell, you couldn’t write this shit……………..…oh wait, he actually did
Re: Claret & Hugh Watch
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2022 9:00 pm
by terrya1965
andyginbrasil wrote: ↑Sat Mar 26, 2022 12:13 pm
C&H.....are obviously on the ball and have written an article on our youngsters various performances for their countries this International break.
But this one was a real eye opener
"Ben Johnson also played for the U21s against Andorra as Lee Carsley’s side won 4-1.
The game was notable for the fact that Johnson played as a centre-back, despite playing at right-back throughout his time with the Irons."
So well done Ben Johnson.....oh hang on..... Johnson was on the bench and didn't actually make it onto the pitch......
Classic....
He must be a "Ghost writer".
I'll get my coat
Re: Claret & Hugh Watch
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2022 10:37 pm
by Whiskyman
andyginbrasil wrote: ↑Sat Mar 26, 2022 5:16 pm
It might be worth his while having a quiet word with Putin to see if he needs another spokesman, better suited me thinks
This is the start of thiier latest piece Andy..
The heaviest speculation surrounding Declan’s future began several months ago when the Daily Telegraph made a series of claims about a new contract over a couple of days
They all sounded spot on and may well – as most believed – have been originated by his Dad/agent Sean.
Among the claims made were that he had rejected a big offer from the club and that a sell on clause would be required in any future deal.
That started a massive feeding frenzy among the media which has bored most of us ever since!
I particularly like the last line about everyone being bored by it. But have any of us who occasionally read this mastrerpiece of journalistic excellence not noticed that it's the topic of discussion they've probably devoted more column incehes to than anything else ?
Re: Claret & Hugh Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:19 am
by eskimo joe
Whiskyman wrote: ↑Sun Mar 27, 2022 10:37 pm
andyginbrasil wrote: ↑Sat Mar 26, 2022 5:16 pm
It might be worth his while having a quiet word with Putin to see if he needs another spokesman, better suited me thinks
This is the start of thiier latest piece Andy..
The heaviest speculation surrounding Declan’s future began several months ago when the Daily Telegraph made a series of claims about a new contract over a couple of days
They all sounded spot on and may well – as most believed – have been originated by his Dad/agent Sean.
Among the claims made were that he had rejected a big offer from the club and that a sell on clause would be required in any future deal.
That started a massive feeding frenzy among the media which has bored most of us ever since!
I particularly like the last line about everyone being bored by it. But have any of us who occasionally read this mastrerpiece of journalistic excellence not noticed that it's the topic of discussion they've probably devoted more column incehes to t
han anything else ?
and they gave us run down to further highlight how bored they are with the topic.
Re: Claret & Hugh Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2022 5:44 pm
by Brookbonds73
Christ, they write some cack that lot.
Re: Claret & Hugh Watch
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2022 6:45 pm
by Towie
Brookbonds73 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 28, 2022 5:44 pm
Christ, they write some cack that lot.
Agree, don’t know why people read it tbh.
Re: Claret & Hugh Watch
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2022 12:43 am
by andyginbrasil
Re: Claret & Hugh Watch
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2022 8:18 am
by Whiskyman
A fine piece of reporting is it not ? The discerning reader will have noticed that the club's sole striker must have failed to impress the redoubtable Mr Whetstone. How do I know this ? Mr W has the , to me, extremely irritating tendency to refer to him as "Mikey" but in yesterday's piece he is referred to simply as "Antonio". Clearly a falling out of some magnitude.
So sorry you couldn't watch the game. I wasted 90 minutes of my life watching it and it annoys the fuck out of me that others were not so unlucky. I always ask myself why I bother watching these PSFs but as yet I haven't come up with a satisfactory answer.
I liked the look of the big lump up front Luton started with though. On the evidence of yesterday I would swap him for Mikey in a flash.
Re: Claret & Hugh Watch
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2022 8:36 am
by Dwayne Pipes
A self important board toady and an old piss head don’t make for great reading imo
Best to avoid.
Re: Claret & Hugh Watch
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2022 10:05 am
by Towie
Whiskyman wrote: ↑Sun Jul 24, 2022 8:18 am
A fine piece of reporting is it not ? The discerning reader will have noticed that the club's sole striker must have failed to impress the redoubtable Mr Whetstone. How do I know this ? Mr W has the , to me, extremely irritating tendency to refer to him as "Mikey" but in yesterday's piece he is referred to simply as "Antonio". Clearly a falling out of some magnitude.
So sorry you couldn't watch the game. I wasted 90 minutes of my life watching it and it annoys the fuck out of me that others were not so unlucky. I always ask myself why I bother watching these PSFs but as yet I haven't come up with a satisfactory answer.
I liked the look of the big lump up front Luton started with though. On the evidence of yesterday I would swap him for Mikey in a flash.
You may find I recommended the big lump up front for Luton a few months ago.