Page 5 of 13
Re: Lingard
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 3:29 pm
by hd1
eskimo joe wrote: ↑Fri Jun 17, 2022 3:18 pm
Where you get your information from is a source, might not be the original source but it's a source non the less. Like I said, you either choose to believe it or not. You asked where the idea came from that he was obsessed with Lingard, I told you there were a few. Are they fact or fiction?! You decide?! I merely pointed out what added credence to the stories. Moyes own words and lack of a striker incoming over two and a half seasons
It is good you find a good reason for the shortage of a striker, but it is hard to swallow his excuse when in need. Saving companies money....He might be searching for a long time until one that ticks all his boxes comes along. But hey ho, let's just say nothing and trust in those weasels. Or let's wait for Lingard.
What ever..each is entitled to his/her own opinion, ? which is right?! As you say only they truly know.
Without wishing to labour the point, if I make up a rumour it is not a source. If someone repeats that made up rumour, it still has no source.
And I didn't say there was a good reason for the striker shortage, nor did I say we should trust them either? That is a classic case of someone saying one thing and it being repeated wrongly, creating an unsubstantiated rumour
Re: Lingard
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 3:33 pm
by eskimo joe
Of course it's a source, where something starts is a source, fact or fiction it doesn't change the fact it is a source. Original source is where it started, a source can be other than the original.
Re: Lingard
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 3:34 pm
by JayK
It’s definitely getting saucy in here
Re: Lingard
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 3:38 pm
by eskimo joe
JayK wrote: ↑Fri Jun 17, 2022 3:34 pm
It’s definitely getting saucy in here
He's right in one thing though, I did make it seem he believed in certain things, but he likes to point them out so much it seems he does
Re: Lingard
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 3:43 pm
by Clayton
eskimo joe wrote: ↑Fri Jun 17, 2022 3:38 pm
JayK wrote: ↑Fri Jun 17, 2022 3:34 pm
It’s definitely getting saucy in here
He's right in one thing though, I did make it seem he believed in certain things, but he likes to point them out so much it seems he does
Now , that I do believe
.
Re: Lingard
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 3:46 pm
by hd1
eskimo joe wrote: ↑Fri Jun 17, 2022 3:38 pm
JayK wrote: ↑Fri Jun 17, 2022 3:34 pm
It’s definitely getting saucy in here
He's right in one thing though, I did make it seem he believed in certain things, but he likes to point them out so much it seems he does
I can't find the face palm emoji
Re: Lingard
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 10:42 pm
by Newmarket
hd1 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 17, 2022 3:46 pm
eskimo joe wrote: ↑Fri Jun 17, 2022 3:38 pm
He's right in one thing though, I did make it seem he believed in certain things, but he likes to point them out so much it seems he does
I can't find the face palm emoji
Ok , true or not , I believe Moyes is obsessed with Jlingz .
And I’m not alone , but it’s my opinion .
As somebody else said this is still a football discussion platform .
Re: Lingard
Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2022 3:27 am
by tassiehammer
hd1 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 17, 2022 3:46 pm
eskimo joe wrote: ↑Fri Jun 17, 2022 3:38 pm
He's right in one thing though, I did make it seem he believed in certain things, but he likes to point them out so much it seems he does
I can't find the face palm emoji
Go to the source and look for it.
Re: Lingard
Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2022 9:00 am
by hd1
tassiehammer wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 3:27 am
Go to the source and look for it.
If only there was one
Re: Lingard
Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2022 9:12 am
by eskimo joe
hd1 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 9:00 am
tassiehammer wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 3:27 am
Go to the source and look for it.
If only there was one
There's always a source be it right or be it wrong. The question is will you find the answers you seek?!
