Hammers v Citeh Posession

Chat about anything football related here!

What do you think our possession percentage over the 90 minutes be?

10 to 15
5
29%
16 to 25
8
47%
26 to 40
4
24%
41 to 50
0
No votes
50+
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 17

User avatar
ToneLoc
Posts: 9669
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2016 2:21 pm
x 226
x 359

Hammers v Citeh Posession

Post by ToneLoc »

I think we'll see some pretty humbling posession stats tomorrow (as if WE need to be any more humble).
Fancy calling your only son "Barnestoneworth"
He's got another name....
Yeah....."United"

User avatar
Clayton
Posts: 10052
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2017 11:29 pm
x 1363
x 1066

Re: Hammers v Citeh Posession

Post by Clayton »

If we actually get any possession it will be passing sideways or back to the keeper it wont be much going forward . :(

User avatar
OZHAMMER
Posts: 3991
Joined: Mon May 30, 2016 7:41 am
Location: Wollongong
x 1512
x 1447

Re: Hammers v Citeh Posession

Post by OZHAMMER »

City dominate possession against much more formidable opponents than us. So it shouldn’t be a surprise when they dominate us 71% - 29%.

User avatar
ToneLoc
Posts: 9669
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2016 2:21 pm
x 226
x 359

Re: Hammers v Citeh Posession

Post by ToneLoc »

OZHAMMER wrote:City dominate possession against much more formidable opponents than us. So it shouldn’t be a surprise when they dominate us 71% - 29%.
29% ?
That's a bit ambitious :lol:
Fancy calling your only son "Barnestoneworth"
He's got another name....
Yeah....."United"

User avatar
OZHAMMER
Posts: 3991
Joined: Mon May 30, 2016 7:41 am
Location: Wollongong
x 1512
x 1447

Re: Hammers v Citeh Posession

Post by OZHAMMER »

ToneLoc wrote:
OZHAMMER wrote:City dominate possession against much more formidable opponents than us. So it shouldn’t be a surprise when they dominate us 71% - 29%.
29% ?
That's a bit ambitious :i am genuinely amused:
I’m an eternal optimist

User avatar
ToneLoc
Posts: 9669
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2016 2:21 pm
x 226
x 359

Re: Hammers v Citeh Posession

Post by ToneLoc »

OZHAMMER wrote:
ToneLoc wrote: 29% ?
That's a bit ambitious :i am genuinely amused:
I’m an eternal optimist
15 of that 29 will be pass backs to Adrian.
Fancy calling your only son "Barnestoneworth"
He's got another name....
Yeah....."United"

User avatar
palerider
Posts: 16025
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2016 8:35 am
Location: Huish Episcopi
x 1250
x 3505

Re: Hammers v Citeh Posession

Post by palerider »

Bug-eyes will have a plan so cunning you could paint it purple, stick it on a harpsichord and say 'Cunning plans are here again'.

Have no fear.






I don't personally have a clue what that plan is btw.

User avatar
OZHAMMER
Posts: 3991
Joined: Mon May 30, 2016 7:41 am
Location: Wollongong
x 1512
x 1447

Re: Hammers v Citeh Posession

Post by OZHAMMER »

ToneLoc wrote:
OZHAMMER wrote:
I’m an eternal optimist
15 of that 29 will be pass backs to Adrian.
1% of it will be the 60m lofted cross-field switch from one of the wingbacks to the other completely unmarked wingback on the other side of the pitch...

... you know the one - it draws the obligatory golf-clap applause from the crowd as though it was an ingenious piece of thinking, and delicate skill.

User avatar
IronsForever
Posts: 6231
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2016 5:22 am
x 1

Re: Hammers v Citeh Posession

Post by IronsForever »

All ou possession will be between the back 5.The it will be a hoof up when under pressure for Arnie to chase.
Come On You Irons!!!!!!!!!!

Broga81
Posts: 477
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 12:10 pm
Location: Southampton

Re: Hammers v Citeh Posession

Post by Broga81 »

Remember its not possession that wins games, it will be the amount of time Adrian has to pick the ball out of the net that does it :lol:

Post Reply