Baroness Brady

Chat about anything football related here!
User avatar
eastcoastclaret
Posts: 1859
Joined: Sun May 29, 2016 2:54 pm
Location: Chris Eubank has written a book about ethics. If it sells well, he'll write one about Kent too
x 551
x 269

Re: Baroness Brady

Post by eastcoastclaret »

I’m not Spartacus either and nor is my wife…
:lol:
gonna need a bigger boat...my thumbs have gone weird...weleese bwian...I didn't eat the salmon mousse...nice beaver...like a glove...I have nipples Greg...the details of my life...he's not the messiah....

User avatar
eskimo joe
Posts: 7710
Joined: Sat May 28, 2016 7:37 pm
x 589
x 1069

Re: Baroness Brady

Post by eskimo joe »

eastcoastclaret wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:35 pm I’m not Spartacus either and nor is my wife…
:lol:
I would have guessed at my missus had she been posting on here.
whufc_crest whufc_crest whufc_crest

User avatar
Optimistic Lee
Posts: 259
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2023 5:49 pm
x 30
x 73

Re: Baroness Brady

Post by Optimistic Lee »

eskimo joe wrote: Thu Mar 16, 2023 5:44 am
OZHAMMER wrote: Wed Mar 15, 2023 9:02 pm Well, this place has livened up a bit!

:lol:
Well I guess it's a distraction from the usual Moyes topic, he is enough to put anyone to sleep.
Recently been ‘distracted’ with work but feel compelled to have another go having seen your posting.

Before I kick off with you once again please confirm that “he is enough to put anyone to sleep” was not directed at me. If not, you can stroll on. However, you have attempted to make yet another snide attack on me I have plenty of ammunition in my arsenal to blow you away.
Tough times never last but tough people do

User avatar
Newmarket
Posts: 18920
Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 10:03 pm
x 2353
x 3422

Re: Baroness Brady

Post by Newmarket »

Optimistic Lee wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 5:32 pm
eskimo joe wrote: Thu Mar 16, 2023 5:44 am

Well I guess it's a distraction from the usual Moyes topic, he is enough to put anyone to sleep.
Recently been ‘distracted’ with work but feel compelled to have another go having seen your posting.

Before I kick off with you once again please confirm that “he is enough to put anyone to sleep” was not directed at me. If not, you can stroll on. However, you have attempted to make yet another snide attack on me I have plenty of ammunition in my arsenal to blow you away.
Can I , in a role of peacemaker , make a couple of suggestions please Lee ?

Firstly , I suggest that the just above post from Joe was referring to the Moyesehia as boring , at least that’s how I read it .
And secondly , the post earlier referring to the long winded posts by a former poster ? Was actually referring to a lad by the moniker of Frogiron , the topic of which was discussed on here only a day or so ago .
So alls fine ;)
Bring back Jonathon !

User avatar
Optimistic Lee
Posts: 259
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2023 5:49 pm
x 30
x 73

Re: Baroness Brady

Post by Optimistic Lee »

Newmarket wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 7:32 pm
Optimistic Lee wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 5:32 pm

Recently been ‘distracted’ with work but feel compelled to have another go having seen your posting.

Before I kick off with you once again please confirm that “he is enough to put anyone to sleep” was not directed at me. If not, you can stroll on. However, you have attempted to make yet another snide attack on me I have plenty of ammunition in my arsenal to blow you away.
Can I , in a role of peacemaker , make a couple of suggestions please Lee ?

Firstly , I suggest that the just above post from Joe was referring to the Moyesehia as boring , at least that’s how I read it .
And secondly , the post earlier referring to the long winded posts by a former poster ? Was actually referring to a lad by the moniker of Frogiron , the topic of which was discussed on here only a day or so ago .
So alls fine ;)
I respect your attempt to advocate for Joe but I would rather see the apology from him rather than you.

I am also fucking annoyed by previous comparisons that have been made between myself and Frogiron.

I am becoming increasingly annoyed and frustrated by Joe’s woefully inaccurate interpretation of the intent of my contributions to this forum.

Worryingly, I think that he believes that his rudimentary understanding of English gives him free licence to misquote or misinterpret my well meaningful contributions to this forum: Yet, you choose to support him.

I am coming to the conclusion that this forum is a bit too ‘close knit’ for my liking and is probably not for me. I am clearly not a member of the inner circle whereas joe clearly is.
Tough times never last but tough people do

User avatar
andyginbrasil
Posts: 7535
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2017 4:05 am
Location: Brasil
x 896
x 1738

Re: Baroness Brady

Post by andyginbrasil »

Newmarket wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 7:32 pm
Optimistic Lee wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 5:32 pm

Recently been ‘distracted’ with work but feel compelled to have another go having seen your posting.

Before I kick off with you once again please confirm that “he is enough to put anyone to sleep” was not directed at me. If not, you can stroll on. However, you have attempted to make yet another snide attack on me I have plenty of ammunition in my arsenal to blow you away.
Can I , in a role of peacemaker , make a couple of suggestions please Lee ?

Firstly , I suggest that the just above post from Joe was referring to the Moyesehia as boring , at least that’s how I read it .
And secondly , the post earlier referring to the long winded posts by a former poster ? Was actually referring to a lad by the moniker of Frogiron , the topic of which was discussed on here only a day or so ago .
So alls fine ;)
And that's why he is the admin on the site







....




And this is just for you NM

Cunt.... :lol:

User avatar
Newmarket
Posts: 18920
Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 10:03 pm
x 2353
x 3422

Re: Baroness Brady

Post by Newmarket »

Optimistic Lee wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 9:02 pm
Newmarket wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 7:32 pm

Can I , in a role of peacemaker , make a couple of suggestions please Lee ?

Firstly , I suggest that the just above post from Joe was referring to the Moyesehia as boring , at least that’s how I read it .
And secondly , the post earlier referring to the long winded posts by a former poster ? Was actually referring to a lad by the moniker of Frogiron , the topic of which was discussed on here only a day or so ago .
So alls fine ;)
I respect your attempt to advocate for Joe but I would rather see the apology from him rather than you.

I am also fucking annoyed by previous comparisons that have been made between myself and Frogiron.

I am becoming increasingly annoyed and frustrated by Joe’s woefully inaccurate interpretation of the intent of my contributions to this forum.

Worryingly, I think that he believes that his rudimentary understanding of English gives him free licence to misquote or misinterpret my well meaningful contributions to this forum: Yet, you choose to support him.

I am coming to the conclusion that this forum is a bit too ‘close knit’ for my liking and is probably not for me. I am clearly not a member of the inner circle whereas joe clearly is.
I’m very sorry to read that you feel that way Lee . I certainly wasn’t apologising for anybody at all .
I’m sure the Eskimo would have clarified his comments in his own time though I doubt he would have apologised for causing you to misunderstand his ‘boring’ comment in the first place . That , my friend , you did all by yourself.

As for the Frog Iron comparison, any such comparison made would have been made solely as a compliment.

Frog was a well liked and respected contributor to this site so if you’re well thought out and well composed posts are similar then I think you’ve already done very well .
Ok so your use of long words that I’ve never personally even heard of lose me sometimes but I’m sure that’s down to my limited education rather than you trying to be clever.

Again , great . Carry on sir , my iPhone has a thesaurus so not a problem.
Nobody wants to lose new members of the forum , indeed I’ve spent ages trying to entice “the lurkers” to join in the fun here .
And it IS fun Lee . It just takes time to get to “get” the general sarcastic sense of humour that prevails here.

That’s why it might appear cliquey to those not itk so to speak .

Stick it out . You won’t regret it if you do your best to not take offence and to give as good as you get .

The use of our sparkling array of emojis help as well although some of these cunts on here forget to use em 🤣
Bring back Jonathon !

User avatar
Optimistic Lee
Posts: 259
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2023 5:49 pm
x 30
x 73

Re: Baroness Brady

Post by Optimistic Lee »

Newmarket wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 11:19 pm
Optimistic Lee wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 9:02 pm

I respect your attempt to advocate for Joe but I would rather see the apology from him rather than you.

I am also fucking annoyed by previous comparisons that have been made between myself and Frogiron.

I am becoming increasingly annoyed and frustrated by Joe’s woefully inaccurate interpretation of the intent of my contributions to this forum.

Worryingly, I think that he believes that his rudimentary understanding of English gives him free licence to misquote or misinterpret my well meaningful contributions to this forum: Yet, you choose to support him.

I am coming to the conclusion that this forum is a bit too ‘close knit’ for my liking and is probably not for me. I am clearly not a member of the inner circle whereas joe clearly is.
I’m very sorry to read that you feel that way Lee . I certainly wasn’t apologising for anybody at all .
I’m sure the Eskimo would have clarified his comments in his own time though I doubt he would have apologised for causing you to misunderstand his ‘boring’ comment in the first place . That , my friend , you did all by yourself.

As for the Frog Iron comparison, any such comparison made would have been made solely as a compliment.

Frog was a well liked and respected contributor to this site so if you’re well thought out and well composed posts are similar then I think you’ve already done very well .
Ok so your use of long words that I’ve never personally even heard of lose me sometimes but I’m sure that’s down to my limited education rather than you trying to be clever.

Again , great . Carry on sir , my iPhone has a thesaurus so not a problem.
Nobody wants to lose new members of the forum , indeed I’ve spent ages trying to entice “the lurkers” to join in the fun here .
And it IS fun Lee . It just takes time to get to “get” the general sarcastic sense of humour that prevails here.

That’s why it might appear cliquey to those not itk so to speak .

Stick it out . You won’t regret it if you do your best to not take offence and to give as good as you get .

The use of our sparkling array of emojis help as well although some of these cunts on here forget to use em 🤣
No need to apologise at all.

Your reassurance is well received and you are the Hammers Chat Kofi Annan.

I will follow your lead and tolerate through gritted teeth the contributions that don’t quite chime with my views.

I have fucked up many academic submissions by relying on thesaurus because it is not capable of contextualising the intent. Nearly fucked my dissertation by trying to type rather than actually write! AI is often the imposter as opposed to your friend.

Thanks for your words of wisdom. :)
Tough times never last but tough people do

User avatar
Newmarket
Posts: 18920
Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 10:03 pm
x 2353
x 3422

Re: Baroness Brady

Post by Newmarket »

Optimistic Lee wrote: Sat Mar 18, 2023 12:20 am
Newmarket wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 11:19 pm

I’m very sorry to read that you feel that way Lee . I certainly wasn’t apologising for anybody at all .
I’m sure the Eskimo would have clarified his comments in his own time though I doubt he would have apologised for causing you to misunderstand his ‘boring’ comment in the first place . That , my friend , you did all by yourself.

As for the Frog Iron comparison, any such comparison made would have been made solely as a compliment.

Frog was a well liked and respected contributor to this site so if you’re well thought out and well composed posts are similar then I think you’ve already done very well .
Ok so your use of long words that I’ve never personally even heard of lose me sometimes but I’m sure that’s down to my limited education rather than you trying to be clever.

Again , great . Carry on sir , my iPhone has a thesaurus so not a problem.
Nobody wants to lose new members of the forum , indeed I’ve spent ages trying to entice “the lurkers” to join in the fun here .
And it IS fun Lee . It just takes time to get to “get” the general sarcastic sense of humour that prevails here.

That’s why it might appear cliquey to those not itk so to speak .

Stick it out . You won’t regret it if you do your best to not take offence and to give as good as you get .

The use of our sparkling array of emojis help as well although some of these cunts on here forget to use em 🤣
No need to apologise at all.

Your reassurance is well received and you are the Hammers Chat Kofi Annan.

I will follow your lead and tolerate through gritted teeth the contributions that don’t quite chime with my views.

I have fucked up many academic submissions by relying on thesaurus because it is not capable of contextualising the intent. Nearly fucked my dissertation by trying to type rather than actually write! AI is often the imposter as opposed to your friend.

Thanks for your words of wisdom. :)
Whoosh ! :lol: :lol: :lol:
Bring back Jonathon !

User avatar
OZHAMMER
Posts: 3931
Joined: Mon May 30, 2016 7:41 am
Location: Wollongong
x 1492
x 1402

Re: Baroness Brady

Post by OZHAMMER »

So we’re going with Frog as the boring, long-winded one?

I didn’t find him boring at all, and certainly not who I had in mind...

Locked